HA 630 Unit 5 marketing mix and referral plan example

Marketing and Strategic Growth in Healthcare Herzing University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This HA 630 Unit 5 marketing mix and referral plan example sets price, access, channel and referral decisions to add 50 cardiac rehabilitation patients in year one. Herzing HA 630 asks MS in Healthcare Administration students to turn targeting into decisions with money and a measure attached, and this sample builds on the Unit 3 and Unit 4 findings: two growth segments and a program behind its rival on start time and hours. The price section shows that a traditional Medicare patient without supplemental coverage owes about $936 for 36 sessions. Access targets cut the median wait from 19 days to 10 and add early and evening blocks. Channels total $67,000, led by a half-time liaison at the regional center. The referral plan applies automatic referral with a bedside visit. The expected result builds the 50 patients from their sources. About 1,050 words.

CourseHA 630 Marketing and Strategic Growth in Healthcare
UnitUnit 5
Paper typeMarketing mix and referral plan
LengthAbout 840 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolHerzing University
ProgramMS in Healthcare Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HA 630 Unit 5

1

Nineteen Days to Ten, $936 Explained Before the First Session, and a Liaison at the Regional Center: A Marketing Mix and Referral Plan for Cardiac Rehabilitation

Student Name

Health Care Administration, Herzing University

HA 630: Marketing and Strategic Growth in Healthcare

Instructor Name

February 12, 2026

What this page is doingThe title leads with the access target, the price problem and the referral investment, in that order. Those three decisions carry most of the plan's budget and most of its expected growth.
2

Nineteen Days to Ten, $936 Explained Before the First Session, and a Liaison at the Regional Center: A Marketing Mix and Referral Plan for Cardiac Rehabilitation

The Decisions This Plan Makes

Units 3 and 4 chose two growth segments, residents whose surgery or procedure happened at the regional center, and residents of the outer counties, and found the program behind its main competitor on time to first session and hours. This plan sets the price, access, channel and referral decisions for the first year, with money and a measure attached to each. The year-one goal is 50 additional new patients, toward the three-year gap of 104 identified in Unit 2.

Price: What the Patient Will Actually Owe

Price is the least discussed and most damaging barrier in this service. Under traditional Medicare, a patient without supplemental coverage owes 20% of the allowed amount for every session. At the program's current Medicare allowed amount of about $130 a session, that is $26 a session, or $936 for a full course of 36 sessions. Commercial and Medicare Advantage members often owe a specialist-level copay of $30 to $50 a session. Patients rarely learn this until the first bill arrives. Evidence from one health system shows that each $10 increase in copay was linked to about 1.5 fewer sessions attended (Farah et al., 2019).

Decisions. First, every referred patient receives a personal cost estimate from a financial counselor before the first session, using the hospital's price estimator and the patient's coverage, so that cost is discussed rather than discovered. Second, patients who qualify under the hospital's written financial assistance policy receive the discount the policy provides; cost sharing is not waived routinely or advertised as waived, because routine waivers for referral-generating patients raise the fraud and abuse concerns studied in the law course. Third, the program director will ask the two largest Medicare Advantage plans to reclassify cardiac rehabilitation from a specialist copay to a lower therapy copay, using their own readmission data. Fourth, the hospital's posted self-pay rate for a session will be listed plainly on the program's web page.

What this page is doingPrice is treated as a set of decisions with a legal boundary, not as a line in a table. The plan explains why a copay waiver is not the answer, which a reader from the law course would check.
3

Access: The Strongest Lever the Program Controls

Targets for the year, each with its current value:

Access measureCurrentTarget by month 6Target by month 12
Days from referral to first session (median)191410
Calls to schedule within two business days of referral58%85%95%
Third next available intake appointment8 days5 days4 days
Session times offeredThree weekday mornings and early afternoonsAdd 6:30 a.m. blockAdd evening block, 4:30 to 6:30 p.m.
Online intake form for referred patientsNoneLiveLive, with text reminders

Why Access Comes First

Early enrollment is a quality measure in its own right, alongside referral before hospital discharge (Thomas et al., 2018), and delays lose patients: nationally, only about a quarter of participants started within 21 days of their event (Ritchey et al., 2020). The added early and evening blocks require a half-time exercise physiologist at about $38,000 a year, which is budgeted as an operating cost rather than a marketing cost but is listed here because the growth depends on it.

Channels, Spend and Measures

The channels are chosen for the segments, not for visibility. Total marketing spend in year one is $67,000.

ChannelSpendReach assumptionJudged on
Referral liaison, half-time registered nurse based two days a week at the regional center$48,000About 30 area residents discharged each month after surgery or complex stentingReferrals from the regional center per month; target 15
Automatic referral order in our electronic record, with a bedside visit by program staff$6,000All eligible patients discharged from this hospital, about 34 a monthShare of eligible discharges referred, target 90%, and enrolled, target 55%
Primary care outreach: visits, referral pads, a one-page guide$4,000 plus liaison time18 practices, about 46 clinicians in counties B to EReferrals from primary care per quarter
Search, maps and listings (detailed in Unit 6)$9,000Families searching after dischargeCalls and intake forms from search
What this page is doingEach channel has a cost, a reach assumption and a measure. The largest spend goes where the largest unreached segment is, which follows from the targeting study.
4

The Referral Plan

Referral is where most of the growth must come from. In a prospective study, automatic referral combined with a bedside conversation produced 85.8% referral and 73.5% enrollment, compared with 32.2% and 29.0% under usual care (Grace et al., 2011). The plan applies that approach to both referral sources.

Inside the hospital. The five cardiologists have agreed to an order set that refers every eligible patient automatically unless the physician opts out with a reason. A program staff member visits each referred patient before discharge to explain the program, book the intake appointment and introduce the financial counselor.

At the regional center. The practices to reach are the cardiothoracic surgery group (four surgeons), the structural heart team, and the interventional cardiology group, together with the discharge planners on the cardiac surgery unit. The liaison visits on the center's two main surgical discharge days each week, identifies patients from the five counties with the discharge planners, and meets them before they leave. The program director and medical director meet the surgery group quarterly to review their patients' results.

Primary care. The liaison visits each of the 18 practices once a quarter, bringing a list of their patients who completed the program, and leaves a one-page guide explaining eligibility and how to refer patients who were never referred after their event.

What the referring physician receives. Confirmation of enrollment within two business days; a first-session report with the patient's baseline exercise capacity, blood pressure response and medication list; a same-day message if the patient reports symptoms or misses two sessions in a row; and a final summary with change in exercise capacity, depression screening results and risk factor status. These reports are the program's most effective promotion to physicians and cost nothing but staff discipline. A template in the electronic record will generate each report from the session data, and the program director will audit ten reports a month for timeliness and completeness during the first year.

Expected Result

The plan's year-one target of 50 additional patients is built from its parts: about 25 from the regional center liaison, 18 from automatic referral in the hospital, 4 from primary care and 3 from search. Unit 8 converts these into contribution and tests a downside case.

References

Farah, M., Abdallah, M., Szalai, H., Berry, R., Lagu, T., Lindenauer, P. K., & Pack, Q. R. (2019). Association between patient cost sharing and cardiac rehabilitation adherence. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 94(12), 2390-2398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.07.018

Grace, S. L., Russell, K. L., Reid, R. D., Oh, P., Anand, S., Rush, J., Williamson, K., Gupta, M., Alter, D. A., & Stewart, D. E. (2011). Effect of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on utilization rates: A prospective, controlled study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(3), 235-241. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.501

Ritchey, M. D., Maresh, S., McNeely, J., Shaffer, T., Jackson, S. L., Keteyian, S. J., Brawner, C. A., Whooley, M. A., Chang, T., Stolp, H., Schieb, L., & Wright, J. (2020). Tracking cardiac rehabilitation participation and completion among Medicare beneficiaries to inform the efforts of a national initiative. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 13(1), Article e005902. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005902

Thomas, R. J., Balady, G., Banka, G., Beckie, T. M., Chiu, J., Gokak, S., Ho, P. M., Keteyian, S. J., King, M., Lui, K., Pack, Q., Sanderson, B. K., & Wang, T. Y. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA clinical performance and quality measures for cardiac rehabilitation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 11(4), Article e000037. https://doi.org/10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000037

What the HA 630 Unit 5 instructions ask for

In Unit 5 you write a marketing mix and referral plan for one clinical service. You will state the decisions the plan makes, then address price, access, channels with spending and measures, the referral process and the expected result. Students often ask how the classic four Ps fit health care. Price means what the patient actually owes after coverage, not the list charge. Place becomes access: wait times, session hours and how easily a referred patient can start. Promotion splits into channels aimed at referrers and at patients. Give every action a cost and a measure. Build the expected result from its parts so readers can see which channel carries the plan.

Inside the HA 630 Unit 5 example

The plan opens with the year-one goal and how it fits the three-year gap. The price section works out the coinsurance per session and over a full course, then commits to a cost conversation and financial assistance screening before enrollment. An access table lists five measures with current values and six- and twelve-month targets. The access rationale cites early enrollment as a quality measure and budgets a half-time exercise physiologist. A channel table gives spend, reach and the measure for the liaison, automatic referral, primary care outreach and search. The referral section describes the order set agreed with the five cardiologists and the liaison's routine at the regional center. The expected result adds 25, 18, 4 and 3 patients.

Where the points sit in the HA 630 Unit 5 rubric

Herzing's rubric for a marketing mix plan usually covers the decisions, price, access or place, channels, the referral process and expected results. Linking every action to a cost and a measure carries the heaviest weight, because a plan without both cannot be funded or judged. Price points reward the patient's real out-of-pocket amount. Access criteria look for wait times and hours with current values and targets. Channel credit goes to spending aimed at the chosen segments rather than broad visibility. Referral points reward an evidence-based process, such as automatic referral with a bedside conversation. Expected results should be built from parts. Grace's automatic referral trial and Thomas's performance measures support the plan.

Common HA 630 Unit 5 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Mix plans in HA 630 Unit 5 tend to falter when price is treated as the hospital's charge rather than what the patient pays. Another frequent problem is promotion spending with no measure attached. Students often skip access, though waits and hours decide whether referred patients start. Channels are chosen for visibility rather than for the target segments. Referral is described as a hope rather than a process with owners. The expected result is a single number with no build. Current values are missing, so targets mean little. Staffing costs for new hours are left out. Finally, give each action a dollar figure and a way to judge it, because graders favor a plan that a program director could fund and then track month by month.

Get a HA 630 Unit 5 example written to your instructions

Send the Unit 5 instructions and the rubric from your HA 630 classroom, plus the service line, the target segment and any budget your section set. We write a custom example with price and access decisions, a referral program naming practices and cadence, and channels carrying spend and measures, returned in 24 to 48 hours. The first custom sample is free.

More HA 630 papers and healthcare administration samples

HA 630 Unit 5 questions, answered

How does price work when insurance pays?

It works through several numbers at once. Network participation determines whether a patient can come to you affordably, the negotiated rate determines what the organization collects, and the out of pocket amount determines what the patient experiences as price. Shoppable service estimates and self-pay rates are visible to the public, so a plan should say what is posted and how estimates are given.

Should the plan include physician outreach as marketing?

In most specialty and diagnostic lines it is the largest part of the work. Referring practices supply volume in bulk, decide quickly, and stop referring for operational reasons such as slow reports or difficulty booking. Treat them as an audience with their own offer, their own contact rhythm and their own retention measures, and say who inside the organization owns the relationship.

How much detail does a channel plan need?

Enough that someone could approve or refuse it. Name the channel, the audience it reaches, the period it runs, what it costs, what creative direction it carries and which measure will judge it. Ranges are acceptable where a figure is genuinely uncertain, provided the assumption behind the range is stated. Unpriced channels are the fastest way to lose a feasibility criterion.

Where can I find a free HA 630 Unit 5 sample paper?

The full HA 630 Unit 5 marketing mix and referral plan is free on this page, cardiac rehabilitation price, access, channels and referral with a cost and measure for each. Plans for other clinical programs can be written to order.

How can hospitals increase cardiac rehab referrals?

Automatic referral orders at discharge combined with a bedside visit from program staff raise referral and enrollment sharply, and a liaison can capture patients treated elsewhere. This sample budgets both.