NSG 223 Unit 8 conflicting priority resolution example

Medical-Surgical Nursing II Herzing University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NSG 223 Unit 8 conflicting priority resolution example argues both sides of a real conflict for the same man on day 6: walk to stay strong or rest the foot to heal it. Herzing NSG 223 closes the second BSN medical-surgical course with two good goals in competition. The mobility case rests on his home function, including driving himself to dialysis, and on deconditioning evidence. The case for the wound rests on pressure on the ball of the foot delaying healing. The resolution sets a daily walking dose small enough to protect the wound, using an offloading shoe and a walker, with chair exercises between walks. What he said is recorded: if I can't get to my car, I can't get to dialysis. Signs that would tip the balance close the paper. About 800 words.

CourseNSG 223 Medical-Surgical Nursing II
UnitUnit 8
Paper typeConflicting priority resolution
LengthAbout 790 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolHerzing University
ProgramBSN
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NSG 223 Unit 8

1

Walk to Stay Strong or Rest the Foot to Heal It: Both Cases Argued at Full Strength, Then Resolved for One Man's Sixth Hospital Day

Student Name

Department of Nursing, Herzing University

NSG 223: Medical-Surgical Nursing II

Instructor Name

March 5, 2026

What this page is doingThe title states both sides of the conflict as instructions a nurse could follow. It signals that each will be argued fully before one is chosen.
2

Walk to Stay Strong or Rest the Foot to Heal It: Both Cases Argued at Full Strength, Then Resolved for One Man's Sixth Hospital Day

The Conflict in One Sentence

On day 6, the composite dialysis patient's deconditioning argues for walking several times a day, while his healing forefoot wound argues for keeping weight off it, and the same nursing hours and the same patient energy have to serve both.

The Case for Putting Mobility First

At home he managed a short walk to the corner store and drove himself to dialysis three times a week. Since admission he has walked on only four occasions, mostly less than 30 m. Hospitalization-associated disability, the loss of the ability to carry out daily activities that a person could manage before admission, is common in older adults and often does not recover after discharge (Covinsky et al., 2011). In an observational study of older hospitalized adults, patients who could walk when admitted nonetheless spent the great majority of hospital hours in bed (Brown et al., 2009). For this man, losing the ability to walk to his car would mean losing independent access to dialysis, which is his lifeline. Immobility also raises the risk of clots in the leg veins, pressure injury over the heels and sacrum, and weakening of the breathing muscles, and his kidney failure and diabetes already add to each of these risks. Every day in bed has a cost that grows.

The Case for Putting the Wound First

The wound on the ball of his right foot is the reason he is here, and it formed because repeated pressure on a foot without sensation broke down the skin and let infection reach bone. The surgery removed infected bone, and the remaining tissue must now heal under a foot that still cannot feel pressure. International guidance on diabetes-related foot ulcers puts offloading, keeping pressure off the ulcer, at the center of healing, and notes that people with neuropathy often exceed safe loading without realizing it (Bus et al., 2024). Every extra step, even in a heel-bearing shoe, carries a chance of pressure on the forefoot, especially when he is tired, turning, or getting up at night. A wound that breaks down now could mean another operation or a larger amputation, and he has already been told that the goal is to save the front of his foot.

What this page is doingThe opposing case is argued as strongly as the first, with its own evidence and the patient's own stakes. That balance is what distinguishes a resolution from a defense of a decision already made.
3

The Resolution

Neither side is chosen outright. The resolution is to set a daily walking dose small enough to protect the wound and large enough to protect his independence, and to add activity that does not load the forefoot.

Walking: three short walks a day, each up to 30 m, only in the heel-bearing shoe, only with physical therapy or a nurse, only after the dressing has been checked, and never at night. A wheelchair is used for longer distances, such as to dialysis. Non-weight-bearing activity: seated leg exercises, sit-to-stand practice using the left leg and arms, and upper-body exercises twice daily, which keep strength without loading the right forefoot. Protection: heel off-loading in bed, turning every two hours, compression devices, and a urinal at night so he has no reason to walk unaccompanied.

How the resolution will be judged: wound edges and drainage at each dressing change; his ability to stand from a chair without help, tested each morning; and whether the walks actually happen, recorded in the shift note.

What He Said

The plan was discussed with him before it was written. He said, "If I can't get to my car, I can't get to dialysis, and then what?" He also said, "I didn't feel the first sore at all. I don't trust my foot." Both statements are recorded because they show he holds both sides of the conflict himself. He agreed to the three short walks and asked for the seated exercises to be written on a card by his bed so he could do them between visits. His agreement matters: a plan he did not accept would be followed only when a nurse was present, and the night-time risk of an unaccompanied walk would remain.

What Would Change the Balance

Any sign of wound breakdown, such as new drainage, redness spreading at the edges, or a blister under the shoe, would shift the balance to strict non-weight-bearing and seated activity only. A decline in his ability to stand from a chair would shift it toward more supervised walking, discussed with the surgical team. The plan is reviewed with him daily, because he is the one who knows how much the loss of walking would cost him. The course text describes the same balance between healing and deconditioning in patients recovering from lower-extremity surgery (Hinkle et al., 2022). The patient is a composite.

References

Brown, C. J., Redden, D. T., Flood, K. L., & Allman, R. M. (2009). The underrecognized epidemic of low mobility during hospitalization of older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57(9), 1660-1665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02393.x

Bus, S. A., Armstrong, D. G., Crews, R. T., Gooday, C., Jarl, G., Kirketerp-Moller, K., Viswanathan, V., & Lazzarini, P. A. (2024). Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 40(3), Article e3647. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3647

Covinsky, K. E., Pierluissi, E., & Johnston, C. B. (2011). Hospitalization-associated disability: "She was probably able to ambulate, but I'm not sure." JAMA, 306(16), 1782-1793. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1556

Hinkle, J. L., Cheever, K. H., & Overbaugh, K. J. (2022). Brunner & Suddarth's textbook of medical-surgical nursing (15th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

What the NSG 223 Unit 8 instructions ask for

Unit 8 asks you to resolve a conflict between two care priorities for one patient. Expect to state the conflict, argue each side at full strength with evidence, propose a resolution, include the patient's view and name what would change the balance. Sections vary on whether one side must win and how much evidence each side needs. Arguing each side fairly is the core of the assignment, so do not weaken the side you reject. A resolution often blends both, with limits and checkpoints. The patient's goals, such as driving to dialysis, should shape the plan. Name the findings that would tip the balance either way. Use evidence for each side, such as studies of hospital deconditioning and guidelines on offloading.

Inside the NSG 223 Unit 8 example

The resolution opens with the conflict in one sentence, which keeps the paper focused. The mobility case describes his usual function and the cost of losing it, with evidence on deconditioning. The wound case describes how pressure delays healing in a diabetic foot, with offloading evidence. The resolution section sets a specific walking dose, equipment and checkpoints. The patient's words are quoted and shape the plan. The final section lists signs that would shift toward rest, such as new drainage, and signs that would allow more walking, such as a clean wound edge at the next dressing change. Both sides are argued so well that the reader could pick either, which makes the blended resolution persuasive.

NSG 223 Unit 8 rubric: what full points look like

Herzing's rubric for a conflicting priority resolution typically covers statement of the conflict, strength of each argument, use of evidence, the resolution, the patient's voice and criteria for change. The strength of both arguments carries the most weight, because a resolution means little if the rejected side was never argued fairly. Statement points reward a clear, single-sentence conflict. Evidence criteria look for support on both sides. Resolution points go to a specific plan with limits and checkpoints. The patient's voice earns credit when it shapes the plan. Criteria for change should be observable. Brown's study of mobility in hospitalized older adults and the IWGDF offloading guideline support both sides.

NSG 223 Unit 8 help before you submit

Priority resolutions in Unit 8 commonly lose points by arguing one side weakly so the other wins easily. Another frequent problem is a resolution without numbers, such as walk as tolerated. Students often leave out the patient's goals. Evidence is cited for one side only. Criteria for change are missing. The offloading shoe and walker are not specified. Earlier units are not used, though they built this patient's picture. Finally, argue both sides at full strength, because graders reward a resolution that a reader could check against two fair cases. Another gap is a resolution with no review date, so nobody knows when to reassess the walking dose. Physical therapy input is often left out, though therapists set safe walking limits after foot surgery. Sleep, mood and appetite, which all improve with movement, are rarely mentioned on the mobility side.

Get a NSG 223 Unit 8 example written to your instructions

Send the Unit 8 instructions and your NSG 223 rubric, plus the case if the assignment supplies one. The example comes back with the conflict stated in one sentence, both cases argued at equal strength, a settlement carrying its cost, and a reversal condition. First custom sample free, returned in 24 to 48 hours.

More NSG 223 papers and BSN samples

NSG 223 Unit 8 questions, answered

Can I resolve the conflict by saying both matter?

That answer removes the assignment. The conflict exists because one shift, one nurse and one pair of hands cannot give both problems first place, so a resolution declining to choose leaves the graded criterion empty. Choose, state what the other problem gives up because of the choice, and record what would be watched as a result of it.

Does the reversal paragraph weaken my argument?

The opposite, in most sections. Saying what would turn the decision around shows the priority was set against a particular picture rather than asserted, and instructors read it as command of the case. Keep it inside the built scenario, describing what a changed record would mean there, rather than writing it as a rule for a reader on shift.

How do I choose which side wins?

From the record you built rather than from a general ranking of which body system outranks another. Point at the findings, the history and the sources you cited, then say which of them carried the decision. A settlement traceable to specific entries survives the defense criterion, while one resting on a remembered ranking usually does not.

Where can I find a free NSG 223 Unit 8 sample paper?

Read the complete NSG 223 Unit 8 priority resolution here at no charge, both sides argued and a blended plan with checkpoints. Ask for a custom resolution if your patient faces a different conflict.

Should a patient with a foot wound walk or rest?

Often both, in measured amounts: a small daily walking dose with an offloading shoe and walker, plus chair exercises, while watching the wound. This sample argues both sides and builds that plan with the patient.