| Course | NSG 323 Community and Public Health Nursing |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 6 |
| Paper type | Disaster preparedness role analysis |
| Length | About 960 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Herzing University |
| Program | RN to BSN |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NSG 323 Unit 6
The Public Health Nurse's Role in River Flooding: A Phase-by-Phase Analysis for One Midwestern County
Student Name
Department of Nursing, Herzing University
NSG 323: Community and Public Health Nursing
Instructor Name
February 24, 2026
The Public Health Nurse's Role in River Flooding: A Phase-by-Phase Analysis for One Midwestern County
The Community and Its Hazard
The setting is a composite county of about 85,000 people along a Midwestern river, with one small city and several farm towns. The county emergency management agency's hazard vulnerability assessment ranks riverine flooding first among its hazards, ahead of tornadoes and severe winter storms, based on frequency and on how many residents live in the floodplain. In the most recent major flood, about 1,200 residents were displaced for up to three weeks, two shelters operated for 19 days, and the county's only dialysis center closed for four days. The floodplain includes a mobile home park of about 140 units, a senior apartment building, and an encampment of people experiencing homelessness on the riverbank.
This analysis examines what a public health nurse at the county health department does across the four phases of this hazard: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. Much of the nursing work falls outside the response phase, before the water rises and after it recedes.
What Floods Do to Health
The health effects of flooding extend well beyond drowning. A systematic review of floods and human health found effects including injuries, infections, and mental health problems, with some of these continuing for months or years after the water recedes (Alderman et al., 2012). In this county, the specific concerns from the last flood were interrupted care for people on dialysis and home oxygen, carbon monoxide exposure from generators used indoors, wound infections during cleanup, and anxiety and depression among displaced families, several of whom lived in shelters for the full 19 days.
The Nurse's Work by Phase
The table summarizes nursing contributions in each phase for this hazard specifically.
| Phase | Nursing contribution for flooding in this county |
|---|---|
| Mitigation | Maintain the list of residents in the floodplain who depend on electricity for medical equipment; advocate at county planning meetings for relocating the dialysis center's backup generator above flood level |
| Preparedness | Help residents on dialysis, oxygen, and insulin make personal flood plans; train shelter nursing volunteers; stock shelter medical supplies; run carbon monoxide and cleanup safety education in spring |
| Response | Staff the shelter health station; screen arrivals for medical and medication needs; coordinate dialysis transfers to the neighboring county; distribute tetanus vaccine to cleanup workers when indicated |
| Recovery | Visit displaced families after return home; screen for mold exposure, injuries, and distress; connect families to mental health services and to disaster assistance; review the response and update plans |
Where Nursing Sits in the Command Structure
When the county activates its emergency operations center, it uses the Incident Command System, the standard structure that defines who reports to whom in an emergency (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA], 2017). Public health and medical services form one emergency support function, led in this county by the health department. During a flood, the public health nurse is not in command. The nurse is assigned to the shelter health station, which falls under the mass care branch of the operations section, and reports to the shelter manager for shelter matters and to the health department's liaison for clinical matters. Knowing this reporting line in advance matters: in the last flood, shelter nurses described receiving conflicting instructions from the shelter operator and the health department because the line had not been clear.
The Response Phase in Practice: The Shelter Health Station
The response work is concrete and repetitive. As each household arrives at the shelter, a nurse or trained volunteer asks a short set of questions: current medical conditions, medications and whether the person brought them, equipment that needs power, dialysis schedule, pregnancy, and anyone in the household who needs help with daily activities. Residents who need more care than a general shelter can safely provide, such as someone on continuous oxygen without a power source or a person needing help with every transfer, are referred to the county's medical needs shelter at the hospital's conference center. The station keeps a log of every health contact so that the next shift can follow up and so that the health department can see patterns, such as a cluster of diarrheal illness that might signal a water or food problem in the shelter. The nurse also watches the shelter itself: crowding, handwashing supplies, food storage, and how people are coping, since distress among displaced residents often surfaces at the health station before anywhere else.
Vulnerable Groups and What Each Requires
Residents on dialysis, about 60 in the county, need a plan for treatment at another center if the local one closes, and a way to get there; the dialysis center's own emergency plan will be reviewed jointly. Residents on home oxygen or other electricity-dependent equipment need backup power or early evacuation; the health department's list, built from the electric utility's medical priority program and home health agencies, is updated each March. Older adults in the senior apartment building need an evacuation plan that accounts for the building's single elevator. Residents of the mobile home park, many of whom speak Spanish, need warnings in Spanish through channels they use, which the park's residents' association has offered to help identify. People living in the riverside encampment receive no warnings by phone or television, so outreach workers will visit the camp when a flood watch is issued.
Capabilities and Gaps
Existing strengths: a tested shelter plan, a trained volunteer pool of 24 nurses from the local hospital and retirees, and good relationships with the emergency management agency. Gaps identified from the last flood's after-action report: shelter medication supply was inadequate for people who evacuated without their medications; there was no process for obtaining emergency prescription refills on weekends; the Spanish-language warning reached the park late; and no one was assigned to follow up with displaced families after the shelters closed. Nursing preparation for disasters, including knowing one's role and the plan, is a professional expectation, not an optional extra (Veenema, 2018).
Recommendations for the Nurse's Next Year
First, work with the regional pharmacy association on a weekend refill process for sheltered residents before the spring flood season. Second, build the Spanish-language warning pathway with the residents' association and test it in April. Third, add a recovery nursing task, visits to displaced families at two and eight weeks after return, to the plan, with a named lead. Fourth, run a tabletop exercise with shelter volunteers that includes the reporting line. Each of these falls in preparedness and recovery, the phases where nursing work most changes how a flood affects people's health.
References
Alderman, K., Turner, L. R., & Tong, S. (2012). Floods and human health: A systematic review. Environment International, 47, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.003
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2017). National incident management system (3rd ed.). U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Veenema, T. G. (Ed.). (2018). Disaster nursing and emergency preparedness for chemical, biological, and radiological terrorism and other hazards (4th ed.). Springer Publishing.
NSG 323 Unit 6 instructions, in plain terms
Unit 6 asks you to analyze the nurse's role in preparing for and responding to a disaster in a community. Expect to describe the community and its main hazard, explain the health effects, describe nursing work by phase, place nursing in the command structure, address vulnerable groups, assess capabilities and gaps and recommend next steps. Many versions ask how to choose a hazard and why preparedness and recovery deserve emphasis. Some sections name a framework such as the disaster management cycle. Choose a hazard the community actually faces. Response gets attention, but most nursing work happens before and after. Vulnerable groups, such as people on dialysis or oxygen, need specific plans. Personal and family readiness for nurses is part of the role.
Inside the NSG 323 Unit 6 example
The analysis opens with the county and why flooding is its main hazard. The health effects section lists consequences beyond drowning, such as injuries, infections and mental health effects. The phase table shows nursing work in each of four phases. The command section explains where public health nursing sits in the Incident Command System. The shelter section shows response work concretely. The vulnerable groups section names each group with its specific needs. The capabilities section lists strengths and gaps honestly. The recommendations section gives specific steps for the coming year. Each section ties to the flood hazard, which keeps the analysis focused rather than general disaster content.
NSG 323 Unit 6 rubric: what full points look like
Herzing's rubric for a disaster role analysis usually covers the hazard and community, health effects, nursing roles by phase, the command structure, vulnerable populations, capabilities and gaps and recommendations. Roles by phase draw close reading, since graders want specific nursing work in mitigation and recovery, not only response. Hazard points reward a realistic choice. Health effects criteria look for evidence beyond immediate injury. Command structure earns credit for accurate placement. Vulnerable group points go to specific needs and plans. Gaps should be honest. Recommendations earn credit for specific steps. Graders also look for the nurse's own household readiness, since nurses who are worried about their families cannot report for duty. Alderman's flood review and FEMA's NIMS document belong in the APA 7 list.
NSG 323 Unit 6 help: mistakes that cost points
Disaster analyses in Unit 6 often slip by focusing only on the response phase. Another frequent problem is a hazard the community does not face. Students often describe disaster nursing in general without tying it to the hazard. Vulnerable groups are named without plans. The command structure is missing. Capabilities and gaps are not assessed. Recommendations are vague, such as improve preparedness. Personal readiness for nurses is ignored. Mental health effects of disasters are left out. Finally, make recommendations specific and owned, because graders reward an analysis that ends with steps a public health nurse could start next month. Another gap is forgetting recovery, when mold, injuries during cleanup and stress bring people to clinics for weeks after the water recedes.
Get a NSG 323 Unit 6 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 6 instructions and the rubric from your NSG 323 classroom, plus the community and hazard your analysis covers. We write a custom example anchored to one hazard, worked through by phase with the command structure stated, returned in 24 to 48 hours. The first custom sample is free.
More NSG 323 papers and RN-to-BSN samples
- NSG 323 Unit 1: Windshield survey
- NSG 323 Unit 2: Family home visit assessment
- NSG 323 Unit 3: Communicable disease investigation
- NSG 323 Unit 4: Health teaching project for a group
- NSG 323 Unit 5: Community assessment
- NSG 323 Unit 7: School or occupational site analysis
- NSG 323 Unit 8: Levels of prevention applied to one problem
- NU 345 Unit 6: Health risk appraisal
- NU 476 Unit 6: Outcome measurement
- NSG 321 Unit 6: Just culture event review
- NSG 324 Unit 6: EBP model applied to a unit change
NSG 323 Unit 6 questions, answered
How do I choose which hazard to write about?
Use the community's own hazard assessment if one exists, and otherwise the events that have actually occurred there. Local emergency management agencies publish these, and working from a real assessment anchors the analysis in something specific. A paper covering hurricanes, earthquakes and pandemics equally describes preparedness in general and this community not at all.
Why emphasize preparedness and recovery?
Because that is where nursing does most of its work and where planning changes outcomes. The response phase is short, highly structured and largely directed by incident command; preparedness determines whether a community's vulnerable residents are known and reachable, and recovery runs for months. Papers that spend everything on the acute phase have covered the smallest part.
Is personal readiness really part of the analysis?
It is a precondition for everything else. A nurse whose own family has no plan, no supplies and no arrangement for children or dependent relatives will not report during an event, and staffing plans that assume otherwise fail predictably. Addressing it briefly shows you understand what actually determines whether staff are available.
Where can I find a free NSG 323 Unit 6 sample paper?
You can read the whole NSG 323 Unit 6 flood preparedness analysis here for free, roles by phase, the shelter station, vulnerable groups and recommendations. An analysis for a different hazard can be written on request.
What does a public health nurse do in a disaster?
Work spans mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery: planning for vulnerable residents, staffing shelter health stations, tracking illness and supporting recovery. This sample maps those roles for a county facing river flooding.