| Course | NSG 423 Policy, Trends, & Ethics in Nursing |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 2 |
| Paper type | Bill tracking record |
| Length | About 750 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Herzing University |
| Program | BSN |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NSG 423 Unit 2
Bill Tracking Record: H.R. 1667, the Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act, From Introduction to Public Law 117-105 and What Comes Next
Student Name
Department of Nursing, Herzing University
NSG 423: Policy, Trends, & Ethics in Nursing
Instructor Name
January 29, 2026
Bill Tracking Record: H.R. 1667, the Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act, From Introduction to Public Law 117-105 and What Comes Next
The Measure
Number and title: H.R. 1667, the Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act. Congress: 117th. Chamber of origin: House of Representatives. A companion bill was introduced in the Senate. Current status: enacted. The bill was signed into law on March 18, 2022, and became Public Law 117-105. Source for status: the official legislative record on Congress.gov, reviewed for this record in January 2026.
The law is named for Dr. Lorna Breen, an emergency physician in New York City who died by suicide in April 2020, after working through the early COVID-19 surge. Her family's advocacy was central to the bill's introduction and passage.
What Its Own Text Does
Read in its enacted text, the law does four things. It authorizes grants to health professions schools, academic health centers, and other entities to train health professions students, residents, and health care workers in strategies to reduce and address suicide, burnout, mental health conditions, and substance use disorders. It authorizes grants to health care entities to establish or expand evidence-informed programs to promote mental health and resiliency among health care workers. It directs the Department of Health and Human Services to carry out a national education and awareness campaign encouraging health care workers to seek support and treatment for their own mental and behavioral health. And it requires studies and reports on health care workforce mental health and on the grant programs. The grant authorizations covered fiscal years 2022 through 2024 (Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act, 2022). Notably, the law authorizes rather than appropriates: it permits spending up to set amounts, but the money itself must be provided in separate appropriations acts, so a program can exist in law and still receive nothing in a given year. That distinction is the first thing to check when judging whether an authorized program is actually operating.
Who Supported It and Why It Passed
The bill was bipartisan, with sponsors from both parties in both chambers, and was supported by national nursing and physician organizations, hospital associations, and mental health advocacy groups. It moved during a period of wide public attention to health care worker strain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Its passage was aided by its modest scope: it authorized grants and a campaign rather than imposing new requirements on employers or licensing boards.
The problem it addresses was well documented before the pandemic. A national report on clinician burnout described burnout as widespread among nurses and physicians and linked it to workplace and system factors, not only individual resilience (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2019). An earlier discussion paper had called burnout a threat to safe, high-quality care (Dyrbye et al., 2017).
What It Would Change for Nurses
For a staff nurse, the law's most direct effect is through its grants: a hospital receiving funds might offer peer support programs, confidential counseling, or training in recognizing distress in colleagues. The awareness campaign encouraged health care workers to seek help. The law did not require employers to offer anything, did not change staffing, and did not change licensing board questions about mental health treatment, which some nurses cite as a reason not to seek care. Those limits matter for judging what the law can and cannot accomplish.
What Happens Next
Because the grant authorizations covered fiscal years 2022 through 2024, the programs' continuation depends on reauthorization and on annual appropriations. The next steps for this record are to check Congress.gov for any reauthorization bill introduced in the current Congress, its number, committee referral, and status; to check appropriations acts for funding of the programs; and to check the Health Resources and Services Administration's reports on grants awarded under the law. Each will be recorded with the date checked and the source. Tracking stops being accurate the day it stops being updated, so the record will be checked again before any use in advocacy.
Where a Nurse's Voice Fits
If a reauthorization bill is introduced, nurses can contribute in three ways: through their professional associations, which comment on legislation and testify at hearings; by contacting their own representatives with specific accounts of what programs funded under the law did, or did not do, in their workplaces; and by pressing their state licensing boards to review application questions about mental health, a change the federal law did not make but which advocates for the law have also sought.
References
Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 117-105 (2022).
Dyrbye, L. N., Shanafelt, T. D., Sinsky, C. A., Cipriano, P. F., Bhatt, J., Ommaya, A., West, C. P., & Meyers, D. (2017). Burnout among health care professionals: A call to explore and address this underrecognized threat to safe, high-quality care [Discussion paper]. National Academy of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.31478/201707b
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Taking action against clinician burnout: A systems approach to professional well-being. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25521
NSG 423 Unit 2 instructions, in plain terms
Unit 2 asks you to track a health policy bill through the legislative process and assess its impact on nursing. Expect to identify the bill, summarize what its text does, describe its path and support, explain effects on nurses, note what happens next and describe how nurses can engage. Students often ask whether to choose a state or federal bill and how to find its history. Congress.gov and state legislature sites give text, actions and votes. Summarize from the bill text, not press releases. Note dates for each major action. Effects on nurses should be specific, such as grant-funded programs a hospital might start. Funding periods matter, since many programs expire without reauthorization.
How this NSG 423 Unit 2 example is built
The record opens with the measure's basic facts: number, title, Congress, chief sponsors and dates. The text section summarizes four provisions in plain language, drawn from the enacted law rather than press releases. The support section explains bipartisan sponsorship, committee action and the votes in each chamber. The effects section translates the law into what a staff nurse might actually see, such as a hospital-funded peer support program or protected time for wellness resources. The next steps section explains the funding window and what reauthorization would require. The engagement section names three ways nurses can contribute, such as testimony through professional associations. Each claim is sourced to the bill text or the official record, so the tracking can be checked.
Where the points sit in the NSG 423 Unit 2 rubric
Herzing's rubric for a bill tracking record typically covers identification of the bill, accurate summary of its text, legislative history, analysis of impact on nursing, future status and engagement. Accuracy against the enacted text draws the closest reading, since press summaries often promise more than a law delivers. Identification points reward number, title, Congress and sponsors. History criteria look for dated actions from introduction to signing. Impact earns credit when effects on nurses are concrete rather than general. Future status points go to funding periods and the need for reauthorization. Engagement should name realistic avenues, such as association advocacy days. Sources from Congress.gov are expected. The record relies on the text of Public Law 117-105.
Common NSG 423 Unit 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
A Unit 2 bill tracking record often weakens when it summarizes news coverage rather than the bill text. Another frequent problem is missing dates for legislative actions. Students often overstate impact, such as claiming the law requires every hospital to provide services, when it funds grants. Funding periods are ignored, so the reader assumes programs are permanent. Engagement is vague, such as contact your representative. The bill's current status is not checked before submission. Sponsors are listed without explaining why support was broad. State laws on similar topics are confused with the federal act. The nurse's view of whether the law helps is missing. Finally, read the enacted text, because graders reward a record that describes what the law actually does.
Get a NSG 423 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 2 instructions and the rubric from your NSG 423 classroom, and say whether the course assigns a measure or leaves the choice open. We write a custom example that fixes the identifying details, dates the status, quotes the text directly, reports both sides fairly, and closes on the unit-level effect. First custom sample free, delivered in 24 to 48 hours.
More NSG 423 papers and BSN samples
- NSG 423 Unit 1: Regulation to practice trace
- NSG 423 Unit 3: Workplace issue brief
- NSG 423 Unit 4: Professional association engagement record
- NSG 423 Unit 5: Competing obligations decision record
- NSG 423 Unit 6: Staffing and safe practice argument
- NSG 423 Unit 7: Emerging trend impact statement
- NSG 423 Unit 8: Professional stance portfolio
- NSG 660 Unit 2: Single study read-through
- NSG 120 Unit 2: Sign and symptom rationale
- NSG 121 Unit 2: Equipment use record
- NSG 122 Unit 2: Patient problem statement set
NSG 423 Unit 2 questions, answered
Where should the status come from?
The legislature's own record or the agency's own docket, cited with the date you looked. Secondary trackers lag and advocacy pages summarize selectively, so a status taken from either can be weeks out of step by the time your work is read. Put the date inside the record itself rather than only in the reference list, since a reader checks it first.
What if the measure has not moved at all?
Report the stall as the finding it is. A bill sitting in committee since introduction, particularly one introduced in earlier sessions too, says more about its support than a paragraph of speculation can. Give the date of the last action, name the committee, and describe what would have to happen for it to move rather than predicting whether it will.
Can a regulation be tracked instead of a bill?
Where your instructions allow it, yes, and the record often comes out stronger. A proposed rule has a docket, a comment period and a publication date, all citable, and the path from proposal to final rule is easier to follow than a bill's. Keep the same fields: identification, dated status, quoted text, positions on each side, practice effect.
Where can I find a free NSG 423 Unit 2 sample paper?
Read the complete NSG 423 Unit 2 bill tracking record here at no charge, H.R. 1667 from introduction to law with effects on nurses. Ask for a custom record on another bill.
What does the Dr. Lorna Breen Act do for nurses?
It funds training and programs to address burnout and mental health among health workers, a national awareness campaign and research. This sample tracks the law and explains how its grants might reach a staff nurse.