NU 476 Unit 7 results presented to the site example

Nursing Capstone Herzing University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NU 476 Unit 7 results presented to the site example is an eight-slide presentation of a bedside shift report project to the nurses of 7 East. Herzing NU 476 asks RN-to-BSN students to report back to the people who did the work, and this sample opens with thanks, specifically: 23 of 26 night shift nurses tried bedside report in the first two weeks. It then reports how often bedside report happened, 81 percent of observed day-to-night reports at the bedside by week six against a 4 percent baseline. Patient survey results and nurse survey results follow, including the 40 percent who said it made report longer. A slide on what did not work names privacy in semi-private rooms. Options for next steps and a closing slide asking what the numbers missed end the deck. Speaker notes accompany each slide. About 650 words.

CourseNU 476 Nursing Capstone
UnitUnit 7
Paper typeResults presentation slides
LengthAbout 740 words, 8 slides
FormatSlide deck with speaker notes, APA 7 references
SchoolHerzing University
ProgramRN to BSN
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NU 476 Unit 7

1

Bedside Shift Report on 7 East: What We Did Together and What the Results Show

Student Name

Department of Nursing, Herzing University

NU 476: Nursing Capstone

Instructor Name

April 14, 2026

What this page is doingThe title credits the unit as a partner and promises results rather than a summary of the student's work. The audience was there for the whole project and will judge the presentation against their own experience of it.
2

Slide 1: Thank You, Specifically

Night shift: 23 of 26 of you tried bedside report in the first two weeks, including on the night of the flu surge.

Day shift charge nurses: you rearranged the 7 a.m. huddle so report could start at the bedside.

Our two champions, who answered questions on every shift for six weeks.

Speaker notes: I want to start by saying what you actually did, because this project was yours as much as mine. You changed a habit that most of you had practiced for years, in the middle of a busy winter, and you told me honestly what was not working. Every change we made in week three came from something one of you said.

What this page is doingThe presentation opens by thanking the unit concretely, naming what staff actually did. A student who took a unit's time and gives back a polished summary of their own work is not well received by the people who were there.
3

Slide 2: What We Set Out to Do

Move nurse-to-nurse shift report from the station to the bedside, with the patient invited to take part.

Measures chosen in January: percentage of reports done at the bedside; patients' rating of being informed; nurses' rating of report quality; report duration.

Speaker notes: As a reminder, we chose these measures together in January. Bedside report aims to include patients in the handover, and research has linked it to improvements in patients' experience of being informed, although results for other outcomes have been mixed (Tobiano et al., 2018). We used the implementation tools from the federal guide on bedside shift report, including the checklist our champions carried (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ], 2013).

Slide 3: How Often It Happened

Day shift to night shift: 81% of observed reports at the bedside by week 6 (baseline 4%).

Night shift to day shift: 52% by week 6 (baseline 2%).

Most common reason for station report at 7 a.m.: patient asleep.

Speaker notes: These are the observation numbers, and the difference between the two handoffs is real. Many of you told me that waking patients at 7 a.m. felt wrong, and the numbers reflect a judgment you made, not a failure. We discuss what to do about it on slide 7.

Slide 4: What Patients Said

Unit survey item "nurses kept me informed about my plan for the day": 71% top-box at baseline, 80% in weeks 4 to 6 (about 60 patients each period).

Comments: "I liked meeting the next nurse." "They talked over me at first."

Speaker notes: The improvement is modest and the sample is small, so I would not claim too much. The second comment matters as much as the first. In the first week several of us, me included, talked to each other while standing next to the patient, which is not the same as including them.

Slide 5: What You Said

Nurse survey, 30 responses: 67% said bedside report improved their understanding of the patient; 40% said it made report take longer.

Median report time per patient: 3.5 minutes at baseline, 4.5 minutes in week 2, 3.8 minutes in week 6.

Speaker notes: Report took longer at first and then settled close to where it started. Other units that have measured this have found both benefits and concerns about time and privacy, which matches what you told me (Sand-Jecklin & Sherman, 2014).

Slide 6: What Did Not Work

Privacy in semi-private rooms: sensitive information was sometimes discussed with a roommate present.

Night-to-day report at the bedside fell to 40% in the week of the flu surge.

Speaker notes: I want to be plain about these, because you know them better than I do. The privacy concern is real, and our fix, saying sensitive details quietly or at the door, is only partly satisfying. The drop during the surge shows the change still depends on having time.

What this page is doingDisappointing results are shown plainly, because the staff know how the implementation went and will judge the presentation against their own experience. Leaving these out would cost the presenter's credibility on every other slide.
4

Slide 7: What We Could Do Next

Morning report: bedside safety check with a quiet voice for sleeping patients, full report at the door.

Privacy: a standard phrase to use when a roommate is present.

Keep the champions for three more months.

Speaker notes: These are suggestions for you to decide on, not recommendations from me. The morning option came from two night nurses, and I think it is better than anything I proposed.

Slide 8: Questions and Your View

What did the numbers miss?

What should the unit keep, change, or stop?

Speaker notes: You were there for every shift of this, and I was there for some of them. I would like to hear what the numbers missed before I write the final report, and I will include what you say in the handover plan.

What this page is doingThe presentation ends by asking the unit what the numbers missed and what to keep, which treats staff as the owners of the change. That framing matters for the handover that follows.
5

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2013). Guide to patient and family engagement in hospital quality and safety: Strategy 3, nurse bedside shift report. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Sand-Jecklin, K., & Sherman, J. (2014). A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(19-20), 2854-2863. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12575

Tobiano, G., Bucknall, T., Sladdin, I., Whitty, J. A., & Chaboyer, W. (2018). Patient participation in nursing bedside handover: A systematic mixed-methods review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 77, 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.014

Reading the NU 476 Unit 7 instructions

Unit 7 asks you to present your capstone results to the site, usually as slides with speaker notes. Expect to thank those involved, restate the aim, report process and outcome results, share staff and patient views, name what did not work, suggest next steps and invite questions. Many versions ask how honest to be about a poor result and what staff most want to hear. Check your section's slide limit and whether notes are required. Staff want to know whether their effort mattered and what happens next. Be honest about problems, since they will know them already. Keep slides simple with one message each, and put detail in the notes. Ask the audience what the numbers missed, which invites ownership.

Inside the NU 476 Unit 7 example

The deck opens with specific thanks, naming numbers rather than general appreciation. The aim slide restates the project in one line. The results slides each carry one finding with the baseline beside it. The staff views slide reports mixed responses honestly, including concerns about time. The slide on what did not work names privacy problems directly. The next steps slide offers options for the unit to choose rather than instructions. The final slide asks for questions and views. Speaker notes explain each number and suggest what to say. The deck respects the audience's time and treats the nurses as partners in the project rather than subjects of it.

Reading the NU 476 Unit 7 rubric

Herzing's rubric for a results presentation typically covers acknowledgment of contributors, clarity of aim and results, honesty about limitations, audience engagement, slide design and speaker notes. Honesty about what did not work draws close attention, since graders want problems presented as plainly as successes. Results points reward baselines beside outcomes. Acknowledgment criteria look for specific thanks. Engagement earns credit for inviting the audience's view. Slide design points go to one message per slide. Notes should explain each slide. Speaker notes that give the denominator behind each percentage are a further plus, and a reviewer will check one or two of them. The AHRQ bedside shift report guide and Sand-Jecklin and Sherman's study belong in the APA 7 list.

NU 476 Unit 7 help before you submit

Results presentations in Unit 7 often slip by crowding slides with text and tables. Another frequent problem is presenting only positive results. Students often thank staff generally rather than specifically. Baselines are missing, so results lack context. Next steps are dictated rather than offered. Speaker notes are absent or repeat the slides. The audience is not invited to respond. Finally, name what did not work, because graders reward a presentation that staff would trust, and nurses who lived the project will notice if problems are left out. Another weak spot is a final slide that closes the discussion rather than opening it.

Get a NU 476 Unit 7 example written to your instructions

Send the Unit 7 instructions and the rubric from your NU 476 classroom, plus your results and the unit you are presenting to. We write a custom example built for the people who hosted the work, with sustainability addressed, returned in 24 to 48 hours. The first custom sample is free.

More NU 476 papers and RN-to-BSN samples

NU 476 Unit 7 questions, answered

How honest should I be about a poor result?

Completely, because the room already knows. Staff watched the implementation, know how many attended, and will notice any account that flatters it. Presenting the result plainly, with what fidelity data you have, earns more credibility than a favorable reading and is also the only version that helps them decide what to do next.

What do they most want to hear?

What changes for them. A unit that gave you access and time wants to know whether the thing you asked them to do was worth it and whether they should keep doing it. Put that early, be specific, and do not make them sit through the literature and the method to reach it.

Who should take the project on?

Somebody who has agreed beforehand. Announcing from the front that a named colleague will continue the work puts them in an impossible position and usually ends the change. Ask before the presentation, find out what they would need, and present it as something already arranged rather than as a request made publicly.

Where can I find a free NU 476 Unit 7 sample paper?

The full NU 476 Unit 7 bedside report results deck is on this page free of charge, eight slides with speaker notes. A presentation of your own capstone results can be written on request.

How do I present capstone results to nursing staff?

Thank people specifically, show each result beside its baseline, share what staff and patients said, name what did not work and ask what the numbers missed. This sample does that in eight slides for a bedside shift report project.