This is the NU 655 Unit 5 service inventory and referral file: existing services recorded by eligibility, cost, hours and access, with the remaining gap named last. Searches like "nu 655 unit 5 assignment example", "nu655 unit 5 sample" and "nu 655 unit 5 example" land here.
What a finished NU 655 Unit 5 service inventory and referral file looks like
The finished file is built to be used at a kitchen table, not read at a desk. Each service occupies an entry with the same fields: what it provides, who qualifies, what it costs somebody with no coverage, when it is open, how a person reaches it without a car, which languages are spoken, whether a referral is required and how long the wait runs. Entries record what was verified and when, since directories go stale faster than anyone expects. A short section notes services existing on paper that proved unreachable when tested. The gap statement comes after the inventory and stays narrow: the need remaining once everything available has been counted, described precisely enough that a proposal could be aimed at it.
How a NU 655 Unit 5 example is structured
The file is ordered the way a referral conversation runs, which is why the eligibility fields come before the description of the service. It opens with the population and the single need being inventoried, because a file covering every need in a county is a directory nobody maintains. The entries follow in a fixed format so two services can be compared without rereading both. Access barriers sit inside each entry rather than in a general section, since a service is only as available as its hours, its cost and the bus reaching it. Verification notes come next, recording what was confirmed and how. The gap statement closes the file and stays disciplined, naming what is missing rather than restating that need exists, because everything before it was assembled to make that claim defensible.
One need, one population
The inventory covers a single need for a defined group, since a file attempting everything becomes a directory that ages faster than anyone can check it.
Eligibility written as a person meets it
Each entry says who qualifies in plain terms, because eligibility rules are where most referrals fail and a summary hiding them is worse than none.
Cost, hours and transport in every entry
Access facts sit with the service rather than in a separate section, as a program open only on weekday mornings is closed to anyone working days.
Verification dated inside the record
Entries note what was confirmed and when, since published directories carry services that moved, closed or stopped taking new people months ago.
Services that exist only on paper
The file marks what could not be reached when tested, which is information no published list will ever contain.
The gap named after the counting
What is missing is stated only once everything available has been recorded, which is what makes the claim of a gap credible.
Where marks go in NU 655 Unit 5
Inventories lose their value the moment they turn into directories. A list of organization names with phone numbers has recorded that services exist without answering the questions deciding access, and the criterion asking for analysis finds nothing analyzed. Jumping straight to the gap is the more serious error, since proposing a new service in an area that already has three is the failure this deliverable exists to prevent. Entries with no eligibility detail mislead whoever holds the file. Undated verification quietly ages into inaccuracy. Files ignoring hours, cost and transport describe availability that exists only for people who already have a car, a flexible employer and coverage, which is rarely the population being served.
Get a NU 655 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 5 instructions and the rubric from your NU 655 classroom, plus the need and area it covers. We write a custom example with the entry fields built, access facts held inside each record, verification dated and a gap statement following the counting. Real local services stay yours to verify. First custom sample free, back in 24 to 48 hours.
NU 655 Unit 5 questions, answered
How many services belong in the file?
Enough to establish whether the need is genuinely uncovered, which for a single need in one area is often eight to fifteen entries. A file with three entries cannot support a claim that something is missing. Where the instructions cap the length, keep the fields complete and reduce the number of services rather than thinning what each entry records.
Do I have to contact the organizations?
Follow the instructions, since some sections ask for verification by phone and others accept published information. Where you do call, record what you asked and what you were told, and keep the notes at the level of service facts rather than anything about individuals. Where you rely on a website, date the entry, because listings frequently describe programs that changed months earlier.
What if the gap turns out to be small?
That is a legitimate result and often the more interesting paper. A population well served for one need and unreachable for another supports a sharper argument than a manufactured shortage. Say what is covered, name the narrow piece that is not, and describe the barrier leaving people short even where a service technically exists, which is the more common finding anyway.