| Course | PS 130 Career Paths in Psychology |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 6 |
| Paper type | Graduate program comparison |
| Length | About 910 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Herzing University |
| Program | BS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PS 130 Unit 6
Six Dimensions Fixed First, Three Programs Reported Against Every One: A Graduate Program Comparison for a Future Behavior Analyst, Using Composite Programs and the Board's 2026 Handbook
Student Name
Psychology, Herzing University
PS 130: Career Paths in Psychology
Instructor Name
September 16, 2026
Six Dimensions Fixed First, Three Programs Reported Against Every One: A Graduate Program Comparison for a Future Behavior Analyst, Using Composite Programs and the Board's 2026 Handbook
Why a Grid, and What Kind of Programs
Unit 5 left me weighing whether to work as a behavior technician while preparing for graduate study toward certification as a behavior analyst. This paper compares graduate programs for that goal. A comparison that describes programs one at a time mostly compares how each catalog writes about itself, so the dimensions are fixed first and every program is reported against all of them in the same order.
The three programs below are composites, built to resemble the kinds of master's programs in applied behavior analysis that publish their requirements online. They are labeled A, B and C. A real comparison would use named programs, quote their own pages and record the date each page was consulted; the method here is the same, and a student using it would replace each composite entry with a dated quotation.
The Dimensions and Why These Six
Whether the program satisfies the board's coursework and degree requirements
The certification board offers more than one route. Its handbook explains that a master's degree from a program accredited by the Association for Professional Behavior Analysts or accredited or recognized by the Association for Behavior Analysis International meets both the coursework and the degree requirements, while a second route combines behavior-analytic coursework with a qualifying degree (Behavior Analyst Certification Board [BACB], 2026). For someone whose goal is certification, this is the first question to ask of any program.
Supervised fieldwork
The handbook requires either 2,000 hours of supervised fieldwork or 1,500 hours of concentrated supervised fieldwork, under supervisors who meet the board's criteria (BACB, 2026). Programs differ in whether they arrange fieldwork, leave it to the student or merely permit it.
Admission requirements
Degree, grade point average, prerequisite courses and any experience expected.
Delivery format
In person, online or mixed, and whether online courses are scheduled or self-paced.
Length and pace
The number of credits and the expected time to complete, full time and part time.
Cost
Published tuition per credit, multiplied out, with fees noted separately.
The Programs Against the Grid
| Dimension | Program A | Program B | Program C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board coursework and degree route | Program recognized by ABAI; meets both requirements | Offers coursework the program says meets the board's coursework requirement; degree in education | Not stated on the program's pages |
| Fieldwork | Arranges placements and supervision for all students | Students arrange their own; program provides a list of partner clinics | Not stated |
| Admission | Bachelor's degree, 3.0 grade point average, one statistics course | Bachelor's degree, 2.75 grade point average, no prerequisites | Bachelor's degree in psychology or a related field; interview |
| Delivery | In person, evenings | Online, scheduled weekly classes | Online, self-paced modules |
| Length | 45 credits, two years full time | 36 credits, two and a half years part time | 36 credits, eighteen months |
| Published tuition | About $27,000 | About $23,400 | About $19,800 |
What the Grid Shows
Read row by row, the programs differ most where it matters most for certification. Program A satisfies the board's requirements through the first route and arranges fieldwork, which is the most complete package and the most expensive. Program B relies on the second route; its degree is in education rather than behavior analysis, which is permissible under that route provided the coursework meets the board's requirements, but the student carries the work of finding fieldwork. Program C is the cheapest and fastest, and its pages do not say whether it meets either route or how fieldwork works. On cost alone, Program C saves about $7,000 over Program A, a difference that would disappear if a student later had to take extra courses to qualify for the examination.
That silence is a finding, not a gap to fill with assumptions. Where a program's material does not answer a dimension, the comparison says so, and for a student whose goal is certification, an unanswered coursework question is close to disqualifying until the program answers it in writing.
Accreditation and Recognition
The certification board itself is accredited by the National Commission for Certifying Agencies (BACB, 2026), which concerns the credential, not the schools. For programs, the relevant marks are the accreditation or recognition the handbook names. Regional accreditation of the university, which allows federal financial aid, is a separate matter and should be checked for every program; a program can sit in an accredited university without its behavior analysis curriculum being accredited or recognized for the board's purposes.
Where My Own Situation Enters
The grid is built to be neutral, but the choice is not. I plan to keep working while studying, which rules out Program A's full-time evening schedule unless I reduce my hours. Program B fits work but would require me to find a fieldwork supervisor, and Unit 5's interview suggests that employers who hire technicians sometimes also supervise fieldwork, which could make a technician job and Program B a sensible pair. The technician ethics code anticipates this arrangement, noting that technicians who are also accruing fieldwork toward a future certification may separately contract for that supervision (Behavior Analyst Certification Board [BACB], 2021), and the technician credential already requires monthly supervision of the technician's own work (BACB, 2025). Keeping those two kinds of supervision distinct on paper would matter, since each serves a different requirement. Program C would need answers before it could be considered at all.
Dates and Limits
The board's handbook used here was updated in June 2026 and consulted on September 12, 2026. Requirements for certification change, and the board's documents include planned changes for 2027 that a student applying later would need to read. The composite programs illustrate typical differences; they are not evidence about any real program's quality, and the figures in the grid are illustrative, not quotations. Two dimensions were considered and left out: outcomes such as the share of graduates who pass the certification examination, because programs publish such figures inconsistently and over different periods, and reputation, because it cannot be reported from a program's own material. A student who can find pass rates for every program in a comparison should add them as a seventh dimension, with the period each figure covers.
References
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2021). RBT ethics code (2.0). https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/RBT-Ethics-Code-240830-a.pdf
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2025). Guidance for meeting RBT requirements during the 2026 transition. https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/RBT-2026-Requirements_250723-a.pdf
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2026). Board Certified Behavior Analyst handbook. https://bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/BCBAHandbook_251223-a.pdf
PS 130 Unit 6 instructions, in plain terms
Unit 6 of PS 130 asks students to compare graduate programs on consistent dimensions. Expect to state the dimensions you chose and why before describing any program, then report every program on every dimension in the same order from its own published material, with the date consulted. Common dimensions include admission requirements, format, length, supervised hours and whether the program holds the recognition a credential path requires. Where a program's material does not answer a dimension, say so rather than guessing. Three programs is usually enough. Accreditation or recognition matters most when a credential depends on it. Including a program you already attend is fine if it is treated like the others.
How the PS 130 Unit 6 example is put together
The paper opens by linking the comparison to the career goal from earlier units and explaining why the programs are composites. Six dimensions are then defined under run-in headings, two of them grounded in the board's handbook. A grid reports three programs against all six. A section reads the grid row by row and treats one program's silence on the board's coursework question as a finding. A short section distinguishes accreditation of the credential, of programs and of universities. Only then does the writer's own situation enter, pairing a part-time program with technician work. The close states dates, limits and two dimensions deliberately left out.
Where the points sit in the PS 130 Unit 6 rubric
The rubric for the graduate program comparison generally rewards dimensions stated and justified before programs, consistent reporting of every program on every dimension, use of programs' own published material with dates, honest handling of missing information, attention to accreditation and a reasoned link to the writer's goals. Stated dimensions earn credit because a comparison without criteria is preference. Consistency is often the largest criterion. Published sources with dates score points. Missing information is credited when reported rather than guessed. Accreditation earns points when tied to a credential path. The personal link is judged on whether it follows the neutral comparison. A grid or table is common, though the comparison can also be written in prose if the order stays fixed.
Common PS 130 Unit 6 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Program comparisons lose points when each program is described in turn with different details, so nothing lines up. Another frequent weakness is choosing dimensions after looking at the programs, which hides bias. Students often fill gaps with assumptions instead of noting what a program does not say. Some ignore whether a program meets the requirements of the credential they want. Others compare cost without accounting for extra courses a cheaper program might require. Many omit consultation dates. If you are building a comparison for a credential path, our writers can help you set the dimensions and lay out the grid. Ranking programs on reputation alone, which cannot be reported from published material, is another frequent slip.
Get a PS 130 Unit 6 example written to your instructions
Forward your Unit 6 instructions with the PS 130 rubric and the programs your section wants set side by side. The example we return declares its dimensions first, answers all of them for every program from official pages, dates what it checked and closes without recommending. The first custom sample costs nothing and takes 24 to 48 hours.
More PS 130 papers and psychology samples
- PS 130 Unit 1: Field overview discussion
- PS 130 Unit 2: Role research paper
- PS 130 Unit 3: Credential and licensure analysis
- PS 130 Unit 4: Employment outlook paper
- PS 130 Unit 5: Informational interview write-up
- PS 130 Unit 7: Ethics and professional conduct paper
- PS 130 Unit 8: Career development plan
- PS 101 Unit 6: Development or personality paper
- PS 105 Unit 6: Theorist comparison
- PS 210 Unit 6: Behavioral difficulty case
- PS 303 Unit 6: Prejudice and stereotyping paper
PS 130 Unit 6 questions, answered
How many programs should the comparison include?
Your instructions usually say, and three is a common count where they do not. What matters more is that the programs differ on something the comparison can show, since three versions of the same format produce a grid with nothing in it. Pick programs that actually diverge on delivery, length or entry conditions and the dimensions do real work.
Does the comparison have to cover accreditation?
Check your instructions, and understand what you are reporting if you include it. Institutional recognition and programmatic recognition are different things, granted by different bodies, and only some credential paths require the second. Report what each program states about its own standing, name the body it names, and avoid ranking programs by a status you have not verified with that body.
Should I include the program I am already enrolled in?
Often yes, and it can be the strongest column, provided you hold it to the same dimensions as the others. The risk is that familiarity fills in answers the published material does not actually give, so cite the same kind of page you cite for everyone else. Keep advising conversations and internal correspondence out of the paper.
Where can I find a free PS 130 Unit 6 sample paper?
The whole PS 130 Unit 6 graduate program comparison is free above, with the six dimensions, the program grid and margin notes. Comparing real programs for a different path? Pass along the assignment and a grid-based comparison is drafted free, usually within two days.
Does a PS 130 Unit 6 comparison have to cover accreditation?
When a credential depends on it, yes. The sample makes the certification board's coursework and degree route its first dimension because it decides whether a program leads to the credential at all.