The BU 345 Unit 5 budget baseline sheet entire: packages costed by a stated method, contingency justified by risk, and the total phased across the schedule. Searches like "bu 345 unit 5 assignment example", "bu345 unit 5 sample" and "bu 345 unit 5 example" land here.
What a finished BU 345 Unit 5 budget baseline sheet looks like
The sheet is discussed in prose but presented as a table, and the table is the deliverable. Rows follow the breakdown numbering exactly, so a reader can move between the two documents without translating. Each row carries labor, materials and any other direct cost, the method used to reach the figure, and a confidence note where the estimate is weak. Contingency appears as its own lines, each tied to a specific risk rather than spread as a percentage across everything. Below the table, a phasing section spreads cost over the schedule periods, which is what turns a total into a baseline. A short passage explains two or three figures a reviewer would question. The closing records that every rate and quantity in the sheet is an assumption made for the exercise.
How a BU 345 Unit 5 example is structured
Costing follows the breakdown rather than the calendar, because a budget organized by period cannot be traced back to the work that generated it. Methods are named row by row instead of once at the top, since analogous, parametric and bottom up estimates carry different confidence and a reader is entitled to know which produced each figure. Contingency is attached to named risks rather than added at the end, which is what separates a reserve from a padding habit. Phasing comes after the total because it depends on the schedule, and a sheet phased before the activities were sequenced usually spreads cost evenly, which no project does. The commentary sits last and volunteers the weak figures, since a reviewer who finds an unexplained number first will read the rest of the sheet suspiciously.
Rows follow the breakdown numbering
Every cost line carries the package address it came from, so a reader can move between the two documents without translating anything.
Method named row by row
Each figure says whether it came from a comparable job, a rate applied to a quantity, or a detailed build up.
Contingency tied to named risks
Reserve lines point at specific threats instead of adding a flat percentage, which is the difference between a reserve and padding.
Phasing turns a total into a baseline
Cost is spread across the schedule periods, because a single number cannot be compared with anything once the work has started.
Weak estimates volunteered, not hidden
A short passage names the two or three figures a reviewer would challenge and says what would firm each of them up.
Rates assumed for the exercise
The closing records that no supplier quote, wage figure or internal cost rate came out of an actual employer's records.
Where marks go in BU 345 Unit 5
Budget sheets lose points at the join with the other documents. A total that cannot be traced back to packages, or rows using different names from the breakdown, tell a marker the sheet was written separately from the plan. Contingency added as a round ten percent with no risk behind it is graded as a habit rather than an estimate. Labor costed without a rate, or a rate applied without hours, leaves a figure nobody can rebuild. Sheets that stop at a total and never phase it have produced an estimate rather than a baseline, and the unit generally names the baseline. Earned value vocabulary used without the numbers to support it reads as recall. Supplier quotes, wage rates and internal cost data taken from work belong to the employer, not to the writer.
Get a BU 345 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 5 instructions and the rubric from your BU 345 classroom, along with the breakdown and schedule the budget has to match. We write a custom example that costs by package, names a method for every figure, ties contingency to risks and phases the total. First custom sample free, returned in 24 to 48 hours.
BU 345 Unit 5 questions, answered
Where do I get rates if the project is composite?
Reason them out and label them. A rate can be built from a published range, from an order of magnitude a reader will recognize as plausible, or simply stated as an assumption for the exercise. What causes a problem is presenting a figure as market truth when it is not, or importing an employer's real cost data, which belongs to the employer.
How much contingency is reasonable?
There is no correct percentage, and reaching for one is how these sheets go wrong. Work from the risks you identified: a supplier with a single source, an estimate resting on one comparable job, a package nobody has attempted before. Attach an amount to each, let the total be whatever those add up to, and say what would release it.
Does the sheet need earned value figures?
Only where the instructions ask, and many sections introduce the idea here without requiring a full calculation. If yours does want it, remember that earned value needs a baseline and some assumed progress, so state the reporting point and the completion you are assuming. Figures presented without those two things cannot be interpreted by anybody.