BU 345 · Business

BU 345 Project Management sample papers, unit by unit

Reviewed by Roland Asquith, MBA Project Management Herzing University Free custom samples in 24–48h

BU 345 turns a vague business goal into a plan with a scope, a schedule, a budget and named risks. This shelf holds sample charters, work breakdowns, schedules and closeout documents across a Herzing term.

How this shelf works

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. BU 345 is Herzing’s Project Management course. It centers on planning and controlling a defined piece of work end to end, from charter and scope through schedule, cost, risk and closeout. Searches like "bu 345 unit 4 assignment example", "BU345 sample paper", and "BU 345 unit samples" land on this page.

What BU 345 is really about

Project management is the most document-heavy course in the business core, and that is the point. BU 345 walks the life cycle: initiation, planning, execution, monitoring and closing, with the vocabulary of charters, work breakdown structures, network diagrams, critical path, earned value and stakeholder registers. Herzing delivers it inside a single compressed term, so the plan you start in the first half is usually the plan you are still developing in the second. Professionals who already run projects at work often find the terminology, rather than the practice, is what the grading turns on. The classroom wants the artifact named correctly and built completely.

The samples here are complete documents, not outlines. A charter states the business case, objectives, high level scope, assumptions, constraints and the sponsor's authority. A work breakdown decomposes to deliverables that could actually be assigned, with a numbering scheme that holds together. Schedules show dependencies and a critical path rather than a row of dates. Risk registers carry probability, impact, an owner and a response for each entry, because a register without owners is a list. Where a unit calls for narrative around the artifact, the sample includes the memo or report that explains it to a reader who was not in the planning meeting.

What BU 345’s assessments ask for

Assignments in BU 345 usually accumulate toward one project you carry through the term. Early units typically ask for a charter and a scope statement on a scenario you select or are given. Middle units build the work breakdown, the schedule and the budget, then add risk and quality planning. Later units often ask you to control the plan: a variance is introduced, and you explain what it does to cost and schedule and what you would change. Discussions in many sections press on judgment rather than definitions, asking why a sponsor would refuse a change request or how you would tell a stakeholder that the date has moved. Templates are frequently required, and using the required one matters.

Where students lose points in BU 345

Plans lose points in BU 345 when they have no edges. A submission describes an ambitious initiative in confident prose, lists activities, attaches a chart, and never states what is in scope, what is explicitly out, or what the baseline is that later variance gets measured against. Without a baseline there is nothing to control, and the control units built on it collapse. The companion failure is a risk section written as reassurance: three generic entries, no probability, no impact, no owner, no trigger. Rubrics usually score scope definition and risk planning as their own rows, so a plan that reads well and defines nothing lands mid-range no matter how polished the writing is.

BU 345 grading scale at Herzing: how the work is graded, from Herzing Assignments
How Herzing grades BU 345, visualized by Herzing Assignments.

The BU 345 drawers

Unit 1

BU 345 Unit 1 project selection record example

Unit 1 often introduces the life cycle and asks for a project selected for the term. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 2

BU 345 Unit 2 charter and stakeholder register example

Charter and stakeholder identification typically follow, with the business case stated plainly. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 3

BU 345 Unit 3 scope and work breakdown document example

Scope definition and the work breakdown structure usually anchor this unit. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 4

BU 345 Unit 4 schedule and dependency chart example

Sequencing, duration estimates and the critical path commonly arrive next. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 5

BU 345 Unit 5 budget baseline sheet example

Cost estimating and budget baselines often appear alongside earned value basics. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 6

BU 345 Unit 6 risk response table example

Risk identification, analysis and response planning generally fill this unit. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 7

BU 345 Unit 7 status report to sponsor example

Quality, communication and change control typically occupy the second to last unit. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 8

BU 345 Unit 8 project closeout file example

Closeout, lessons learned and the final plan submission usually end the term. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

Herzing University revises courses; unit counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a BU 345 sample the right way

Project documents are easier to imitate than to invent, which is exactly what a sample is for. Open one beside your instructions and check the parts: does your charter carry the same elements, does your breakdown decompose to the same level, does every risk entry have an owner. Then build yours on your own scenario, in your own words, and submit it as your work. If your unit asks for an artifact this page does not show yet, send the instructions and the rubric and the first custom sample is free, back within 24-48h.

How these samples are written

Every sample on this rail is written the way the custom ones are: the rubric decoded row by row, clinical registers held exactly, formats shipped clean. Herzing revises classrooms; a custom request is always written to the rubric in YOUR course, never from a stale template.

BU 345 questions, answered

How detailed does the scope statement have to be?

Detailed enough that a reader could reject work as out of scope. Name the deliverables, the boundaries, the acceptance criteria and the assumptions behind them. Vague scope is the single biggest reason later plan units fall apart, because schedule, budget and risk all inherit whatever the scope failed to fix in place.

My risk register keeps coming back marked as generic. What does a strong one look like?

Specific to your project, with each entry naming the event, its probability, its impact on cost or schedule, an owner and a planned response. Delay and budget overrun are outcomes, not risks. Trace each risk back to something in your scope or schedule, and the register stops reading like a template someone filled in.

Can I use a real project from my job for the term's assignments?

Usually the best choice, as long as you keep confidential details out. Strip client names and figures you cannot share, keep the structure, and the plan gains realism that invented projects never have. Send the instructions and rubric with a short description and the first sample comes back free within 24-48h, built on your scenario.