NSG 122 Unit 1 nursing process walkthrough example

Nursing Fundamental Concepts Herzing University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NSG 122 Unit 1 nursing process walkthrough example applies all five stages to a composite 84-year-old retired school custodian admitted dry and weak after three days of vomiting and diarrhea. Herzing NSG 122, Nursing Fundamental Concepts, opens the BSN fundamentals course with the nursing process as one argument, and this sample shows each stage feeding the next. Assessment gathers his vital signs, orthostatic drop, dry mouth and low urine output. Diagnosis states the problem: deficient fluid volume related to active fluid loss. Planning sets short- and long-term goals, such as a set hourly output by day two. Implementation lists nursing actions, starting with measuring every intake and loose stool. Evaluation returns to the goals as written: output averaged 42 mL an hour. It follows Potter's fundamentals text and Herdman's NANDA classification. About 700 words.

CourseNSG 122 Nursing Fundamental Concepts
UnitUnit 1
Paper typeNursing process walkthrough
LengthAbout 850 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolHerzing University
ProgramBSN
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NSG 122 Unit 1

1

Five Stages, One Argument: The Nursing Process Applied to an 84-Year-Old Man Admitted Dry and Weak After Three Days of Vomiting and Diarrhea

Student Name

Department of Nursing, Herzing University

NSG 122: Nursing Fundamental Concepts

Instructor Name

January 14, 2026

What this page is doingThe title names the patient and the problem in plain words and states that the five stages form one argument. A reader should be able to trace every goal and action back to the data at the start.
2

Five Stages, One Argument: The Nursing Process Applied to an 84-Year-Old Man Admitted Dry and Weak After Three Days of Vomiting and Diarrhea

Assessment

He is a composite: 84, retired from thirty years as a school custodian, living on his own in a ground-level apartment, walking with a four-wheeled walker. He was admitted to a medical floor after three days of vomiting and loose stools; the vomiting stopped yesterday, and he had two loose stools this morning.

What he said (subjective data): "I haven't been able to keep anything down, so I stopped drinking." "I feel wobbly when I stand up." "My mouth feels like cotton." "I'm so tired."

What was observed and measured (objective data): lying blood pressure 124/70, heart rate 88; standing blood pressure 102/62, heart rate 108, with dizziness after one minute. Temperature 37.2 °C. Weight 64.1 kg; his clinic weight two months ago was 67.0 kg. Tongue dry with a furrowed surface. Urine output 180 mL in the eight hours since admission, dark amber. Serum sodium 146 mmol/L and blood urea nitrogen 38 mg/dL, both above the laboratory's reference ranges. Alert and oriented, but slower to answer than his daughter says is usual. Needed one person's help to stand from the bed.

The two kinds of data are kept apart because they carry different weight. His statements tell us what he experiences; the measurements show what can be checked and repeated. Some commonly taught bedside signs, such as skin turgor, are unreliable in older adults: a systematic review found that very few single signs or tests could identify water-loss dehydration in people over 65 (Hooper et al., 2015). Here the weight loss, the standing blood pressure, the urine output, and the laboratory values carry the assessment, and skin turgor was not used.

What this page is doingSubjective and objective data are listed separately, with his own words kept intact. The note on skin turgor shows why some data were chosen over others, which the assessment stage needs to justify.
3

Diagnosis: The Problem Statement

Deficient fluid volume related to active fluid loss through vomiting and diarrhea and reduced oral intake, as evidenced by weight loss of 2.9 kg, a fall in systolic blood pressure of 22 mm Hg on standing with a rise in heart rate, dry tongue, urine output of 180 mL over 8 hours, and raised serum sodium and urea nitrogen.

The statement follows the format and wording used in the course's classification text (Herdman et al., 2024). Every piece of evidence named in it appears in the assessment above. His dizziness on standing also supports a second problem, risk for falls, which is addressed in the mobility plan later in the course and noted here only so the first goal is not written in isolation.

Planning: Goals

Short-term goal: by the end of the second day of admission, the patient will have a urine output of at least 30 mL per hour averaged over each eight-hour shift, and a standing systolic blood pressure within 10 mm Hg of his lying pressure.

Longer-term goal: by discharge, expected on the fourth day, he will drink at least 1,500 mL a day without prompting for two consecutive days, and his weight will be within 1 kg of his clinic weight of 67.0 kg.

Each goal is about the patient, not the nurse, and each has a number and a date, so a reader can tell whether it was met.

Implementation: Nursing Actions

Measure and record all intake and output, including each loose stool, every shift. Weigh him daily at 0600, before he eats, using one scale and similar clothing each time. Measure lying and standing blood pressure and heart rate every eight hours, standing him with one person assisting and the walker in front of him. Offer 150 to 200 mL of a drink he chooses every hour while awake, keeping a filled cup within reach of his stronger right hand. Monitor the intravenous fluids ordered by the provider and report output below 30 mL per hour for two consecutive hours. Report the morning sodium and urea nitrogen results to the provider. Teach him and his daughter why fluids matter and how to spot the return of dizziness or dark urine.

Each action is something a nurse carries out, not an order to be written. The fluid volumes, intravenous rate, and laboratory frequency are set by the provider's orders; the nursing actions deliver, measure, and report.

What this page is doingActions are written as nursing actions and tied to the problem statement's evidence. The line about what the provider decides keeps the plan within the nurse's role.
4

Evaluation

Evaluation returns to the goals as written. By the end of day two, his output averaged 42 mL per hour on the day shift and 35 mL per hour overnight: met. His standing systolic pressure was 114 against a lying pressure of 122, a difference of 8 mm Hg: met. By the morning of day four he had drunk 1,600 mL and 1,550 mL on the previous two days, the second day without prompting from staff: partly met, since the first day needed three prompts. His weight was 66.4 kg, within 1 kg of his clinic weight: met. The fluid problem is resolved; the drinking habit is not yet secure, so his discharge teaching focuses on a daily drinking routine.

The patient is constructed for this assignment, and the problem statement wording follows the classification cited. General principles of the nursing process follow the course fundamentals text (Potter et al., 2023).

References

Herdman, T. H., Kamitsuru, S., & Takáo Lopes, C. (Eds.). (2024). NANDA International nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification, 2024-2026 (13th ed.). Thieme.

Hooper, L., Abdelhamid, A., Attreed, N. J., Campbell, W. W., Channell, A. M., Chassagne, P., Culp, K. R., Fletcher, S. J., Fortes, M. B., Fuller, N., Gaspar, P. M., Gilbert, D. J., Heathcote, A. C., Kafri, M. W., Kajii, F., Lindner, G., Mack, G. W., Mentes, J. C., Merlani, P., ... Hunter, P. (2015). Clinical symptoms, signs and tests for identification of impending and current water-loss dehydration in older people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Article CD009647. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009647.pub2

Potter, P. A., Perry, A. G., Stockert, P. A., & Hall, A. M. (2023). Fundamentals of nursing (11th ed.). Elsevier.

What the NSG 122 Unit 1 instructions ask for

Unit 1 asks you to walk one patient through all five stages of the nursing process. Expect to gather assessment data, write a problem statement, set measurable goals, list nursing actions and evaluate against the goals as written. Many versions ask whether the patient can be a composite and how much data belongs in assessment. Check whether your section uses NANDA labels or plain problem statements. The stages should connect: each problem must rest on assessment data, each goal must address a problem and each action must serve a goal. Evaluation should quote the goal and say whether it was met. Use a composite patient to protect privacy. Keep data relevant to the problem rather than listing every finding.

How this NSG 122 Unit 1 example is built

The walkthrough opens with assessment, giving history, vital signs, orthostatic readings, mucous membranes, weight and output. The diagnosis section writes the problem with its related factor and evidence. The planning section sets a short-term goal with a number and a date and a longer goal for discharge. The implementation section lists actions in order, each linked to the goal it serves, such as offering fluids hourly while awake. The evaluation section quotes each goal and states met, partly met or not met with the evidence. Each stage is labeled so the grader can find it quickly, and the chain from data to outcome is visible from top to bottom.

NSG 122 Unit 1 rubric: what full points look like

Herzing's rubric for a nursing process walkthrough usually covers assessment data, the problem statement, goals, nursing actions, evaluation and the links between stages. The links between stages are where most marks are decided, since graders trace each action back to a goal and each goal back to assessment data. Assessment points reward relevant subjective and objective findings. Problem statement criteria look for correct format with related factors and evidence. Goal points go to measurable, dated outcomes. Action criteria look for specific, realistic nursing interventions. Evaluation earns credit when it quotes the original goal. Composite patients and plain language are expected. Potter's fundamentals text supports the walkthrough, with NANDA labels from Herdman and colleagues.

Common NSG 122 Unit 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Walkthroughs in Unit 1 often slip by listing every assessment finding without selecting what supports the problem. Another frequent problem is a goal that cannot be measured, such as patient will be hydrated. Students often write actions that belong to the prescriber, such as start IV fluids, instead of nursing actions like offering fluids hourly and tracking output. Evaluation drifts from the goal as written. The problem statement lacks evidence. Stages are not labeled. Actions have no rationale. Dates are missing from goals, which makes evaluation impossible. The orthostatic readings, often the most telling finding, are left out. Finally, connect every stage to the next, because graders reward a walkthrough that reads as one argument from data to outcome rather than five separate lists.

Get a NSG 122 Unit 1 example written to your instructions

Send the Unit 1 instructions and the rubric from your NSG 122 classroom, with the case the assignment supplies. We write a custom example that keeps the data split, derives the problem statement from findings on the page, sets measurable goals and evaluates against them. First custom sample free, back in 24 to 48 hours.

More NSG 122 papers and BSN samples

NSG 122 Unit 1 questions, answered

I have not started clinical hours yet. Is this assignment doable?

Yes, and Unit 1 assumes it. The walkthrough is written from a case on the page rather than from a patient you have met, and the process itself is what the assignment examines. Check-offs in the lab, and any care given to a living person, remain yours alone; an example stands in for neither.

How closely do the stages have to line up?

Closely enough that a reader can trace any action back to a finding without guessing. Instructors in many sections read the paper backwards for exactly that, starting at evaluation and working up. If a goal has no problem statement behind it, or a problem has no data, the chain is broken at that point and the marks follow the break.

Can I use the format from my skills lab paperwork?

Check the instructions first, since sections differ on whether they want a table, a set of headings or continuous prose. What stays constant is the order and the linking. Where your classroom supplies a template, fill it rather than inventing one, and keep the wording of the problem statement in whatever form your course teaches.

Where can I find a free NSG 122 Unit 1 sample paper?

The full NSG 122 Unit 1 nursing process walkthrough is free on this page, five stages for an older man admitted with fluid loss. A walkthrough built around your own patient is available on request.

What are the five steps of the nursing process?

Assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation and evaluation. This sample applies all five to an 84-year-old man with deficient fluid volume and judges each goal exactly as written.