| Course | NSG 421 Nursing Informatics |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 1 |
| Paper type | Informatics support pathway map |
| Length | About 640 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Herzing University |
| Program | BSN |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NSG 421 Unit 1
Five Roles and What Travels Between Them: An Informatics Support Pathway Map Traced Through One Banner That Kept Showing the Wrong Code Status
Student Name
Department of Nursing, Herzing University
NSG 421: Nursing Informatics
Instructor Name
January 16, 2026
Five Roles and What Travels Between Them: An Informatics Support Pathway Map Traced Through One Banner That Kept Showing the Wrong Code Status
The Map
The setting is a composite 30-bed medical-surgical unit using a commercial electronic health record. Each role is a box with one line on what it decides and what it cannot.
| Role (box) | Decides | Cannot decide |
|---|---|---|
| Staff nurse | What to document and when; whether a problem is worth reporting | How a screen behaves or what it displays |
| Super user (a staff nurse with extra training, one per shift) | Whether a problem is user error or a system issue; how to work around it for now | Any change to the system |
| Help desk (hospital-wide, by phone) | Whether a call becomes a ticket and how urgent it is | Clinical meaning of the problem |
| Informatics nurse (for the nursing department) | Whether a nursing workflow problem needs a build change; how to test it clinically | The technical build itself |
| Analyst (information services) | How to change the build | Whether the change is clinically correct |
What Travels Along the Lines
Staff nurse to super user: a spoken description at the desk, usually with the screen still open. Super user to help desk: a phone call that becomes a ticket with a number, a category, and a priority. Help desk to analyst: the ticket, routed by category. Help desk to informatics nurse: the same ticket, copied when the category is "clinical documentation." Informatics nurse to analyst: a clarified requirement, what the screen should do and why. Analyst to informatics nurse: a test version to check. Informatics nurse to staff nurse and super user: a message about the fix, usually by email and at the unit huddle. The line most often missing in practice is the last one: the nurse who reported the problem often never hears what happened.
Following One Problem Along the Map
The problem: a patient's code status was changed by the provider from full code to do not resuscitate after a family meeting at 1400. The order was signed at 1415. At 1900 the evening nurse saw "FULL CODE" still displayed in the banner across the top of the chart. The order screen showed the new status. Two places in one record disagreed about the most time-critical fact a responding team needs.
1905. The evening nurse told the super user at the desk. The super user opened a second chart where the status had also been changed that day and found the same problem, which ruled out a single user error.
1915. The super user called the help desk; ticket opened, category "clinical documentation," priority high because of patient safety. The super user placed a paper alert on the patient's door and chart per the unit's downtime procedure and told the charge nurse.
0830 next day. The informatics nurse reviewed the ticket, reproduced the problem in the test environment, and found that the banner refreshed only when the chart was closed and reopened by any user after the order was signed; on a busy unit this might not happen for hours.
Day 2 to Day 5. The analyst changed the banner to refresh when a code status order is signed. The informatics nurse tested it with three scenarios and approved it.
Day 6. The fix was announced at the unit huddle. The evening nurse who reported it was told directly by the informatics nurse, closing the loop that the map shows is often left open.
What the Map Shows
Each role did only what it could decide. The super user did not try to fix the system but made the patient safe with a paper alert; the analyst did not decide what the banner should show but built what the informatics nurse specified. The informatics nurse was the translation point between clinical meaning and technical change. Research on super users during electronic record implementation found that they influence colleagues both by solving problems and by shaping how others view the system (Yuan et al., 2015). Here, the super user's quick check of a second chart turned a single complaint into evidence of a system problem, which is what got the ticket its priority.
The course text describes the informatics nurse as the bridge between clinical practice and information technology (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2022). The problem was a sociotechnical one in the sense used in informatics: a technical refresh rule met a human workflow in which charts stay open for hours (Sittig & Singh, 2010). The unit is composite and no real system is named.
References
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2010). A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(Suppl. 3), i68-i74. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2010.042085
Yuan, C. T., Bradley, E. H., & Nembhard, I. M. (2015). A mixed methods study of how clinician "super users" influence others during the implementation of electronic health records. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0154-6
What the NSG 421 Unit 1 instructions ask for
Unit 1 asks you to map how informatics support works on a unit and trace one problem through it. Expect to name the roles involved, describe what passes between them, follow a real or composite problem along the path and draw a conclusion about how support works. Students often ask which roles to include and how detailed the problem should be. Typical roles include the staff nurse, a super user, the help desk, an informatics nurse and an analyst who changes the build. What travels between roles matters as much as who they are, such as a screenshot or a ticket number. Choose a problem with clinical stakes, such as a wrong code status banner. Keep patient details out of screenshots. Explain where the path could break, since that is where patient risk lives.
How the NSG 421 Unit 1 example is put together
The map opens with the setting and five roles drawn as boxes with lines between them. The travel section describes each line, from verbal reports to tickets and build requests, with what detail each carries. The problem section follows the code status banner from the nurse's first notice to the analyst's fix, with times and what each role decided. Each step shows one role handing off what it could not decide. The final section explains why the path worked and where it could have broken, such as a ticket without a screenshot. The paper keeps a clinical focus throughout, since the banner error could have led staff to misunderstand a patient's wishes in an emergency.
NSG 421 Unit 1 rubric: what full points look like
Herzing's rubric for an informatics pathway map usually covers identification of roles, description of what travels between them, the problem trace, analysis and use of informatics sources. The trace of one problem carries the most weight, since it shows the map working rather than just drawn. Role points reward accurate scope for each position, from super user to analyst. Travel criteria look for specific content passed along each line, such as ticket details. Analysis earns credit when weak points in the path are named. Clinical stakes, such as code status errors, are often credited. Patient privacy in screenshots is expected. A clear diagram or table helps the reader. The ANA's Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards and McGonigle and Mastrian's text support the roles.
Common NSG 421 Unit 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Pathway maps in Unit 1 often slip by listing roles without describing what passes between them. Another frequent problem is a problem trace that skips steps, such as jumping from the nurse straight to the analyst. Students often confuse the super user's role with the informatics nurse's. Tickets are described without the detail that makes them actionable, such as a screenshot or the patient encounter. Clinical stakes are not stated. Weak points in the path are not named. Patient identifiers appear in examples. The map shows a hierarchy rather than a flow. Times are missing from the trace. Finally, follow one problem from start to fix, because graders reward a map that shows support working in practice.
Get a NSG 421 Unit 1 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 1 instructions and the rubric from your NSG 421 classroom, with any role list or support diagram the course supplies. We write a custom example that places the staff nurse at the center, gives every role a limit, labels the connections and walks two ordinary problems along them. First custom sample free, back in 24 to 48 hours.
More NSG 421 papers and BSN samples
- NSG 421 Unit 2: Charting workflow record
- NSG 421 Unit 3: Documentation burden log
- NSG 421 Unit 4: Data entry to report trace
- NSG 421 Unit 5: Alert response record
- NSG 421 Unit 6: Chart access boundary record
- NSG 421 Unit 7: End user change request
- NSG 421 Unit 8: Bedside technology evidence file
- NSG 120 Unit 1: Disease process summary
- NSG 121 Unit 1: Assessment technique sequence
- NSG 122 Unit 1: Nursing process walkthrough
- NSG 123 Unit 1: Problem ranking write-up
NSG 421 Unit 1 questions, answered
Do I need to know how our systems are configured?
No, and the map is better without it. This document describes roles and routes rather than software settings, and the course is examining where a user sits among them. Configuration details from a workplace system are not yours to publish in coursework anyway, so keep the map at the level of who does what and who takes the call.
What if my unit has no super user?
Draw what exists and say what is missing. A map with an empty position, labeled and explained, describes the arrangement more accurately than one borrowed from a textbook diagram. Sections often credit the gap, since noticing that a route ends nowhere is exactly the observation a user is placed to make. Keep the description general enough that no workplace is identifiable.
Is this the same as writing about the informatics nurse role?
Not in this course. A paper about the specialist role describes what that person analyzes and designs, which is the work the graduate sequence covers. Here the specialist is one box among several, and the document is written from where a user stands, by somebody who documents in the system and passes problems along. Keep the standpoint fixed throughout.
Where can I find a free NSG 421 Unit 1 sample paper?
The full NSG 421 Unit 1 informatics pathway map is free on this page, five roles and one code status problem traced to its fix. A map built on your own unit's support path can be prepared on request.
Who fixes electronic health record problems on a hospital unit?
Usually a chain: the staff nurse reports, a unit super user checks, the help desk logs a ticket, an informatics nurse reviews the clinical impact and an analyst changes the build. This sample follows one banner error along that chain.