| Course | NSG 123 Medical-Surgical Nursing I |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 1 |
| Paper type | Problem ranking write-up |
| Length | About 780 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Herzing University |
| Program | BSN |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NSG 123 Unit 1
Five Problems on Admission, Ranked and Defended: A 58-Year-Old Dispatcher With Diverticulitis and a Small Abscess Beside the Colon
Student Name
Department of Nursing, Herzing University
NSG 123: Medical-Surgical Nursing I
Instructor Name
January 16, 2026
Five Problems on Admission, Ranked and Defended: A 58-Year-Old Dispatcher With Diverticulitis and a Small Abscess Beside the Colon
The Patient as the Case Supplies Her
A composite 58-year-old woman who works nights as a county emergency dispatcher is admitted from the emergency department with four days of worsening pain in the left lower abdomen. A CT scan shows inflammation of the sigmoid colon with a 4 cm collection of pus beside it, a pericolic abscess. On arrival to the floor: temperature 38.6 °C, heart rate 108, blood pressure 118/72, respiratory rate 20, oxygen saturation 97% on room air. Pain 8 of 10, worse with movement; she lies still with her knees drawn up. Nauseated, vomited twice today, has eaten almost nothing for two days. White cell count 16,800. Potassium 3.2 mmol/L. Orders include nothing by mouth, intravenous fluids and antibiotics, and consultation with interventional radiology about draining the abscess. She takes lisinopril for blood pressure and ibuprofen for back pain. She says, "I can't be off work long. We're short-staffed."
The Problems, in the Order the Case Presents Them
Acute pain. Infection, with a localized abscess and a systemic response. Fluid volume deficit from vomiting and poor intake. Low potassium. Anxiety about work. Risk from ibuprofen use (listed here because it appears in the case; it is a medication question to raise, not a nursing problem to rank).
The Framework
The ranking uses the physiological threats first, then safety, then psychosocial, and within the physiological level asks which problem could harm her soonest if nothing were done (Hinkle et al., 2022). A problem that causes others ranks above the problems it causes.
The Ranked Sequence
1. Infection with a systemic response. The finding that raises it now: fever of 38.6 °C, heart rate 108, and a white count of 16,800, with a known abscess. Together these show that her body is reacting to the infection beyond the colon. It outranks fluid deficit because the infection is the source of the fever and part of the reason she is not eating; untreated, a pericolic abscess can progress or rupture, which is the complication guidelines for complicated diverticulitis are written around (Hall et al., 2020). Nursing's part is making sure antibiotics start on time, watching for the signs of spreading infection, and preparing her for drainage.
2. Fluid volume deficit. Finding: two episodes of vomiting, two days of minimal intake, a heart rate of 108 that fever alone may not explain, and her lisinopril, which can blunt her body's response to low volume. It ranks below infection because it is partly caused by it, and above pain because a fall in blood pressure would be a more immediate threat than pain. It is also the problem whose improvement nursing can measure most directly.
3. Low potassium. Finding: 3.2 mmol/L after vomiting. It could have been placed with the fluid deficit, since the cause is the same, but it has its own risk: low potassium can disturb heart rhythm and slow the bowel. It ranks third rather than second because at this level it is mild and replacement is already ordered, while the fluid problem affects her circulation now.
4. Acute pain. Finding: 8 of 10, guarding, lying still with knees drawn up. Pain matters a great deal to her, and it limits deep breathing and moving. It ranks fourth not because it is less real, but because treating the infection is what will reduce it, and because a sudden change in her pain is one of the key signs that the abscess is worsening, so it is also a monitoring point for problem 1.
5. Anxiety about work. Finding: her statement about being short-staffed and needing to return. It is last on the physiological-first framework, but it has a practical consequence: a patient worried about leaving may underreport pain or push for early discharge, which feeds back into problem 1.
What Would Change the Order
A sudden increase in pain spreading across the whole abdomen, a rigid abdomen, or a fall in blood pressure would suggest the abscess has ruptured. That would put infection at the top with new urgency and move pain from a comfort problem to a sign requiring immediate report. A potassium below 3.0, or new palpitations, would move potassium above fluid. If the fever and heart rate settle after antibiotics and drainage, fluid and pain would become the leading nursing problems.
The ibuprofen is not ranked, but it is reported: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are linked to diverticulitis and its complications, and expert guidance advises patients with a history of diverticulitis to avoid them apart from aspirin prescribed for heart protection (Peery et al., 2021). The patient is a composite.
References
Hall, J., Hardiman, K., Lee, S., Lightner, A., Stocchi, L., Paquette, I. M., Steele, S. R., Feingold, D. L., & Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. (2020). The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 63(6), 728-747. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001679
Hinkle, J. L., Cheever, K. H., & Overbaugh, K. J. (2022). Brunner & Suddarth's textbook of medical-surgical nursing (15th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Peery, A. F., Shaukat, A., & Strate, L. L. (2021). AGA clinical practice update on medical management of colonic diverticulitis: Expert review. Gastroenterology, 160(3), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.059
The Herzing NSG 123 Unit 1 instructions
Unit 1 asks you to rank a newly admitted patient's problems and defend the order. Expect to present the patient, list problems as the case gives them, state your framework, rank with reasons tied to findings and say what would change the order. Sections vary on how many problems to rank and whether a framework is named. Physiological threats come first, and within them, threats to circulation and oxygenation outrank discomfort. Each rank should cite a specific finding, such as a heart rate or a lab value. Name triggers that would move a problem up, since priorities shift as patients change. Keep the patient composite. Psychosocial problems belong on the list even when they rank last, because they shape the patient's cooperation.
How this NSG 123 Unit 1 example is built
The write-up opens with the patient's presentation, vital signs and labs. The problem list follows in the case's order, which lets the reader see the reordering. The framework section explains the levels used and the rule for breaking ties. The ranked sequence gives each problem its position and the finding that raises it now, such as fever and tachycardia for infection. Pain ranks below infection and fluid even though it is the patient's main complaint, and the write-up explains why. The change section names findings that would signal perforation or peritonitis and would reorder everything. The structure shows the ranking is reasoned from data rather than from habit or the patient's loudest complaint.
Where the points sit in the NSG 123 Unit 1 rubric
Herzing's rubric for a problem ranking usually covers the patient presentation, the problem list, the framework, reasons tied to findings and triggers for change. Reasons tied to findings carry the most weight, since every rank must be defended with this patient's numbers rather than with a general rule. Presentation points reward relevant vital signs, labs and history. List criteria look for problems supported by the case. Framework points go to a clear rule for ordering and breaking ties. Trigger points reward findings that would move a problem up, such as rigidity or a drop in blood pressure. Psychosocial problems ranked rather than ignored are often credited. Concise writing helps. The ranking draws on the diverticulitis and prioritization content in Hinkle and Cheever's medical-surgical text.
NSG 123 Unit 1 help before you submit
Problem rankings in Unit 1 often slip by putting pain first because the patient complains most about it. Another frequent problem is ranking without citing findings. Students often ignore systemic signs of infection such as fever and tachycardia, which point to sepsis risk. Ties are left unbroken even though the framework gives a rule for them. Triggers for change are missing. Psychosocial problems are dropped. The list includes problems the case does not support. Labs are quoted without saying why they matter. Ranks are stated without the reasoning behind each. Finally, defend each rank with a number from the chart, because graders reward a ranking that a charge nurse could check against the vital signs and agree with.
Get a NSG 123 Unit 1 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 1 instructions and the rubric from your NSG 123 classroom, with the case the assignment supplies. We write a custom example that lists the problems before ranking them, names the framework in the opening, argues each position against the one beneath and says what would reorder the sequence. First custom sample free, back in 24 to 48 hours.
More NSG 123 papers and BSN samples
- NSG 123 Unit 2: Fluid and electrolyte study
- NSG 123 Unit 3: Nursing intervention rationale
- NSG 123 Unit 4: Condition change case study
- NSG 123 Unit 5: Preoperative and postoperative record
- NSG 123 Unit 6: Condition and nursing response paper
- NSG 123 Unit 7: Handoff report record
- NSG 123 Unit 8: System focused case study
- NSG 223 Unit 1: Comorbidity interaction study
- NSG 233 Unit 1: Deterioration recognition record
- NSG 298 Unit 1: Question breakdown record
- NSG 421 Unit 1: Informatics support pathway map
NSG 123 Unit 1 questions, answered
How is this different from the fundamentals ordering assignment?
The frameworks overlap, but the material does not. An adult patient in this course usually presents with several active problems at once, and the paper is graded on the comparison between them rather than on placing needs in a familiar hierarchy. Expect the findings to carry more weight and the arguments between neighboring positions to be closer.
Do I need a source for the framework?
Cite it wherever your instructions ask, and name the version your course teaches even when they do not. Frameworks are described slightly differently between texts, and a paper applying one shape while the classroom teaches another creates an argument you did not intend. One line at the top naming the description you followed usually settles it.
What if the case does not give enough information?
Say so where it bites, and rank on what is there. Missing information is worth a sentence of its own: naming the finding that would settle a position, and where it would come from, reads as control rather than as complaint. What weakens a paper is inventing the missing value and ranking as though the case had supplied it.
Where can I find a free NSG 123 Unit 1 sample paper?
The full NSG 123 Unit 1 diverticulitis ranking is free on this page, five problems defended with findings and the triggers that would reorder them. Your own admission case can anchor a custom ranking.
Why might infection rank above pain in a nursing priority list?
Because fever and a fast heart rate signal a systemic response that can progress to sepsis, a threat to circulation, while pain, though distressing, is not immediately life-threatening. This sample ranks infection first for that reason.