| Course | BU 421 Operations Management |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 4 |
| Paper type | Demand planning record |
| Length | About 910 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Herzing University |
| Program | BS in Business Management |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for BU 421 Unit 4
Level Beats Chase by About $111,000: A Demand Planning Record That Turns a Composite Cabinet Plant's Seasonal 2027 Forecast Into Staffed Quarters
Student Name
Business, Herzing University
BU 421: Operations Management
Instructor Name
February 25, 2026
Level Beats Chase by About $111,000: A Demand Planning Record That Turns a Composite Cabinet Plant's Seasonal 2027 Forecast Into Staffed Quarters
Quarterly Demand and Its Seasonal Pattern
Like most of its industry, Tallgrass Cabinet Works, this course's invented Omaha cabinet plant, sells more cabinets in spring and summer, when homeowners remodel, than in fall and winter. This record converts the plant's 2027 forecast into quarterly labor requirements and compares three ways of staffing them. The history below, in cabinet boxes shipped, is taken from the plant's own shipping log, which is part of the invented case.
| Quarter | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Three-year average | Seasonal index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 10,000 | 10,500 | 11,000 | 10,500 | 0.875 |
| Q2 | 12,300 | 12,800 | 13,300 | 12,800 | 1.067 |
| Q3 | 12,900 | 13,500 | 14,100 | 13,500 | 1.125 |
| Q4 | 10,800 | 11,200 | 11,600 | 11,200 | 0.933 |
| Year | 46,000 | 48,000 | 50,000 | 12,000 per quarter | 4.000 |
Removing the Seasonal Pattern
Each seasonal index is the three-year average for that quarter divided by the average of all quarters, 12,000 boxes. Q1's index, for example, is 10,500 divided by 12,000, or 0.875, meaning first quarters run about 12.5 percent below an average quarter. The four indices sum to 4.000, as they should.
Dividing each 2026 quarter by its index removes the season and exposes the trend. Deseasonalized, the 2026 quarters are 12,571, 12,469, 12,533 and 12,429 boxes, nearly flat within the year, which confirms that the swings in the raw figures are seasonal rather than signs of changing demand. Across years the series grows by about 2,000 boxes annually, and the forecast for 2027 is 52,000 boxes, the same figure used in the capacity worksheet. Spread as 13,000 a quarter and multiplied back by the indices, the quarterly forecast becomes 11,375 in Q1, 13,867 in Q2, 14,625 in Q3 and 12,133 in Q4. Nahmias and Olsen (2015) describe this ratio-to-average method as the simplest way to separate a stable seasonal pattern from trend.
| Quarter | Seasonal index | 2027 forecast (boxes) | Labor hours at 2.4 per box | Workers needed at 520 hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 0.875 | 11,375 | 27,300 | 52.5 |
| Q2 | 1.067 | 13,867 | 33,281 | 64.0 |
| Q3 | 1.125 | 14,625 | 35,100 | 67.5 |
| Q4 | 0.933 | 12,133 | 29,119 | 56.0 |
| Year | 52,000 | 124,800 | 60.0 average |
From Boxes to Labor Hours
Across the plant, from cutting to packing, one cabinet box consumes 2.4 direct labor hours on average. That rate comes from dividing 2025's direct labor hours by boxes shipped, and it held within 3 percent in each quarter of the year. One worker supplies 520 regular hours a quarter, 13 weeks of 40 hours. Multiplying boxes by 2.4 gives hours, and dividing by 520 gives the workforce each quarter would need if output exactly matched demand. The plant begins 2027 with 58 workers and 1,000 standard carcasses in stock. Those unfinished boxes, in the sizes that about 70 percent of orders use, can be built ahead and finished when an order arrives, which is what makes a level plan possible for a semi-custom maker.
The costs used to compare the plans are the plant's 2025 figures: regular time at $28 an hour loaded, overtime at $42 an hour, $4,200 to recruit and train each new hire, $3,000 per separation for severance and unemployment insurance, and $6 per carcass per quarter to hold stock, counting space, handling and the money tied up.
Plan A: Level Output
The level plan holds 60 workers all year, which supplies 31,200 hours and 13,000 boxes each quarter. Two workers are hired at the start of Q1. Inventory absorbs the season: stock builds in Q1 and runs down through the summer.
| Quarter | Workers | Output | Demand | Ending stock | Cost lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 60 | 13,000 | 11,375 | 2,625 | Hire 2: $8,400 |
| Q2 | 60 | 13,000 | 13,867 | 1,758 | |
| Q3 | 60 | 13,000 | 14,625 | 133 | |
| Q4 | 60 | 13,000 | 12,133 | 1,000 | |
| Year | 52,000 | 52,000 | 5,516 carcass-quarters | Regular time $3,494,400; holding $33,096; hiring $8,400; total $3,535,896 |
Plan B: Chase Demand
The chase plan changes the workforce each quarter to match requirements, rounded to whole workers: 53 in Q1, 64 in Q2, 68 in Q3 and 56 in Q4. Starting from 58, that means five separations in Q1, 11 hires in Q2, four hires in Q3 and 12 separations in Q4. Stock stays at the 1,000-carcass buffer throughout.
| Quarter | Workers | Change | Output | Ending stock | Cost lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 53 | 5 separated | 11,375 | 1,000 | $15,000 |
| Q2 | 64 | 11 hired | 13,867 | 1,000 | $46,200 |
| Q3 | 68 | 4 hired | 14,625 | 1,000 | $16,800 |
| Q4 | 56 | 12 separated | 12,133 | 1,000 | $36,000 |
| Year | 15 hired, 17 separated | 52,000 | 4,000 carcass-quarters | Regular time $3,508,960; hiring $63,000; separation $51,000; holding $24,000; total $3,646,960 |
Plan C: Steady Workforce With Summer Overtime
A third plan keeps the current 58 workers, hires no one and covers the shortfall with overtime. Fifty-eight workers supply 30,160 regular hours, or about 12,567 boxes, a quarter, which falls 1,733 boxes short of the year's demand. Those boxes need 4,160 overtime hours, all placed in Q3, about five and a half hours a week per worker for 13 weeks. Ending stock runs 2,192, 892, 567 and 1,000. The plan costs $3,377,920 in regular time, $174,720 in overtime and $27,906 in holding, a total of $3,580,546.
Comparison and Recommendation
The level plan costs $3,535,896, the overtime plan $3,580,546 and the chase plan $3,646,960. Level is cheapest by about $45,000 against overtime and about $111,000 against chase. Chase loses because hiring and separating 32 people a year costs $114,000, far more than the $9,000 of added holding cost the level plan pays to carry stock through the spring. Overtime loses because each overtime hour costs half again as much as a regular hour, and the plan buys more than 4,000 of them.
The level plan has one weak point: stock falls to 133 carcasses at the end of Q3, leaving little protection if summer demand runs above forecast. Tallgrass should adopt the level plan with 60 workers, keep overtime in reserve for Q3 if the stock falls below 500 carcasses in August and review the forecast at the end of each quarter. A stable workforce also supports the delivery reliability that Unit 1 ranked first, since new hires in a chase plan would be learning the job during the busiest quarter of the year. Heizer et al. (2020) note that level strategies suit firms whose inventory is cheap to hold and whose skilled labor is costly to replace, which describes a cabinet plant with a buildable stock of standard carcasses. Stevenson (2021) adds that the lowest-cost plan should be checked against the service it provides, which is why the recommendation carries the August trigger. Tallgrass Cabinet Works and every figure in this record are composites created for this course.
References
Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2020). Operations management: Sustainability and supply chain management (13th ed.). Pearson.
Nahmias, S., & Olsen, T. L. (2015). Production and operations analysis (7th ed.). Waveland Press.
Stevenson, W. J. (2021). Operations management (14th ed.). McGraw Hill.
What the BU 421 Unit 4 instructions ask for
Unit 4 of BU 421 is the aggregate planning assignment. Students take a demand forecast for several periods, usually quarters or months, and compare ways of meeting it: a level strategy that holds output steady and builds inventory, a chase strategy that changes the workforce with demand, and often a mixed plan using overtime, part-time staff or subcontracting. Most prompts require a forecast with a seasonal pattern, costs for hiring, layoffs, overtime and holding inventory, a table for each plan and a recommendation. Some add a question about what the plan does to service or employees. Expect three to five pages with tables in APA 7. The numbers should be traceable from demand through labor hours to cost, since instructors often recompute one plan to check the method.
How this BU 421 Unit 4 example is built
The record begins with the plant's quarterly shipments and seasonal pattern, then removes that pattern with indices so the trend can be forecast before seasonality is restored. Forecast boxes are converted to labor hours with a stated standard, which makes all three plans comparable in the same unit. Plan A holds output level and carries stock from winter into spring. Plan B hires and separates 32 people a year to follow demand. Plan C keeps a steady crew and buys summer overtime. Each plan has its own table with every cost line visible, and the comparison section totals them: level about $3.54 million, overtime about $3.58 million and chase about $3.65 million. The recommendation also names the level plan's weak point, low stock at the end of the third quarter, and sets a trigger for overtime.
Reading the BU 421 Unit 4 rubric
Aggregate planning rubrics at Herzing usually allocate points to the forecast, the construction of each plan, the cost comparison and the recommendation, with a smaller share for presentation and sources. The forecast criterion rewards a stated method for seasonality rather than numbers that simply appear. Plan construction is judged on internal consistency: ending inventory must follow from beginning inventory, production and demand in every period. Cost comparison scores fully when every cost category appears in every plan, including those that come out at zero. The recommendation earns top marks when it weighs something beyond cost, such as service or workforce stability, and when it tells a manager what to watch. Tables that line up period by period make all of this easier for an instructor to verify.
BU 421 Unit 4 help: mistakes that cost points
The quickest way to lose points on the demand planning unit is an inventory balance that does not add up from one quarter to the next. Students also forget hiring and separation costs in the chase plan, which makes it look cheaper than it is. Another frequent error is applying seasonal indices in the wrong direction, dividing where the method calls for multiplying. Some papers compare plans only on total cost and never ask what a plan does to delivery or to the people hired and let go each year. Others recommend a plan without naming its risk, such as thin stock before the peak. Keep the labor standard visible and consistent, and state it once, since a changed standard between plans makes the comparison meaningless.
Get a BU 421 Unit 4 example written to your instructions
Forward the Unit 4 instructions, the BU 421 rubric and the demand figures or cost parameters your assignment supplies. We write a custom example that removes the seasonal pattern, converts units into hours once, works level and chase in full on identical cost lines and names what the recommendation assumes. First custom sample free, returned in 24 to 48 hours.
More BU 421 papers and business management samples
- BU 421 Unit 1: Competitive priorities brief
- BU 421 Unit 2: Process flow documentation
- BU 421 Unit 3: Capacity planning worksheet
- BU 421 Unit 5: Inventory policy write-up
- BU 421 Unit 6: Waste reduction proposal
- BU 421 Unit 7: Quality control chart record
- BU 421 Unit 8: Supply chain scheduling file
- BU 245 Unit 4: Persuasive message
- BU 302 Unit 4: Team dynamics write-up
- BU 321 Unit 4: Confidence interval report
- BU 380 Unit 4: Capability and resource audit
BU 421 Unit 4 questions, answered
Which plan is normally the right answer?
Neither, until the costs are on the page. A level plan wins where holding inventory is cheap and the workforce is hard to replace; a chase plan wins where inventory is expensive or perishable and labor is flexible. The record earns its marks by showing which condition holds in the composite case, not by preferring one strategy in advance.
Where do the seasonal indices come from?
From the history the assignment supplies, averaged period by period against the overall mean, unless your instructions provide indices directly. Show the computation rather than the result alone. Where the history is too short to support an index, say so and plan on the raw series with that limitation stated, which reads better than an index built on two observations.
Should overtime count as a separate option?
Include it where the case gives a rate, because it is often the cheapest way to absorb a short peak without hiring. Treat it as a cost line in both grids rather than as a third plan, unless the instructions ask otherwise. Note any limit on hours per person, since an unlimited overtime assumption makes the arithmetic easy and the plan unusable.
Where can I find a free BU 421 Unit 4 sample paper?
This page carries the whole BU 421 Unit 4 demand planning record at no cost, with the seasonal index table, all three plan tables and margin notes. For a different forecast or cost set, email the prompt and a no-cost custom version built on your numbers follows within about 48 hours.
Should BU 421 Unit 4 always recommend the cheapest plan?
Not always. The cheapest plan is a strong starting point, but the rubric rewards weighing service, workforce stability and risk. The sample picks the level plan partly on cost and partly because a stable crew protects delivery reliability during the busy season.