A worked BU 442 Unit 6 earned value calculation: planned value, earned value and actual cost fixed at a status date, then variances, indices and what they imply. Searches like "bu 442 unit 6 assignment example", "bu442 unit 6 sample" and "bu 442 unit 6 example" land here.
What a finished BU 442 Unit 6 earned value calculation looks like
The heart of it is a table with one row per control account and three columns of money at a single date. Planned value comes off the time-phased budget, actual cost comes from the case ledger, and earned value comes from a stated rule for crediting partial progress, which the example names explicitly because the rule is where most of the argument lives. Variances follow as differences and indices as ratios, each written out once so the reader can see which pair produced which. A short interpretation paragraph sits under each control account rather than under the total, since a project that looks healthy overall often hides one account carrying the whole problem. The closing lists what earned value cannot tell anybody about quality or scope.
How a BU 442 Unit 6 example is structured
The status date is fixed first and everything is measured at it, because the three figures only mean something when they describe the same moment and drafts that mix a month-end cost with a mid-month progress reading produce indices nobody can use. The rule for crediting partial completion is declared before any earned value appears, since a fifty percent rule and a rule crediting only finished elements give different answers from identical work. Variances are computed before indices so a reader sees the absolute gap before the ratio, which keeps a large percentage on a small account in proportion. Interpretation is attached per account rather than only to the project, as aggregation is how a serious problem gets averaged into invisibility. The limits close the document, because earned value measures conformance to plan and says nothing about whether the plan was worth following.
One status date for all three
Planned value, earned value and actual cost are read at the same moment, because figures from different dates produce indices that mean nothing.
The progress crediting rule declared upfront
How partial completion earns value is stated before any number is credited, since different rules give different answers from the same work.
Variances shown before the indices
The absolute gap appears first so a large ratio on a small account is not mistaken for a large problem.
Interpretation written per control account
Each account gets its own reading, because a project total in reasonable shape can conceal one account carrying every bit of the trouble.
What the method cannot see
The closing states that earned value measures conformance to a plan and reports nothing about whether the work is any good.
Where marks go in BU 442 Unit 6
Earned value work loses credit by producing indices without a rule behind them. Percent complete claimed for an element with no completion criterion makes the whole calculation a matter of opinion, and this is the commonest defect in the unit. Actual cost read at one date against progress read at another produces figures that cannot reconcile. Indices reported at project level only bury the account that is failing. Formulas restated from the reading, with no numbers run through them, answer a recall question instead of doing the work. An index quoted to three decimal places from estimated progress claims precision the inputs never had. Reporting the numbers and stopping leaves the interpretation the criterion asks for unwritten. Cost ledgers and timesheet extracts from an employer's system cannot supply these inputs.
Get a BU 442 Unit 6 example written to your instructions
Upload the Unit 6 instructions, the BU 442 rubric your classroom carries, and the baseline, progress data and status date the assignment sets. We write a custom example that fixes one status date, declares the crediting rule, shows variances before indices and interprets each control account separately. First custom sample free, returned in 24 to 48 hours.
BU 442 Unit 6 questions, answered
Which crediting rule should the example use?
Use whichever rule the instructions specify; if the choice is yours, pick one and defend it in a sentence. Crediting nothing until an element finishes is conservative and easy to audit; crediting a fixed share at start and the rest at finish smooths reporting; crediting measured units suits work with countable output. The choice matters less than stating it and applying it consistently across every account.
Do I need software to do this?
A spreadsheet is normally enough and often preferred, because the formulas stay visible and a marker can follow them. Where your section requires a particular tool, use it and still show one account calculated by hand. What loses credit is a screen capture of results with no working, since the arithmetic is precisely what this unit is examining.
Can a schedule index be favorable while the project is late?
Yes, and noticing it is worth marks. The schedule index is built from money rather than from dates, so work finished early on a non-driving chain can lift it while the critical path slips. Say what the index reads, then check it against the network from the earlier unit, and report the disagreement rather than letting the ratio speak alone.