HA 625 Unit 1 regulatory authority memo example

Healthcare Law and Ethics Herzing University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This HA 625 Unit 1 regulatory authority memo example answers whether an emergency department's rule against insurance questions before the screening exam is required by law or is the hospital's own choice. Herzing HA 625, Healthcare Law and Ethics, asks MS in Healthcare Administration students to find the controlling source and separate law from preference, and this sample gives the short answer first: the core is required by EMTALA, while the exact timing adds a safety margin. The legal sources section cites 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd and the CMS regulation at 42 C.F.R. § 489.24. A two-column section lists what the law requires and what the hospital has chosen. Three front desk situations are worked through, such as a patient asking whether the hospital takes their plan. The recommendation keeps the policy and adds two changes. About 890 words.

CourseHA 625 Healthcare Law and Ethics
UnitUnit 1
Paper typeRegulatory authority memo
LengthAbout 890 words, 5 pages
FormatBusiness memo with analysis, APA 7 references
SchoolHerzing University
ProgramMS in Healthcare Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HA 625 Unit 1

1

Memorandum

To: Director, Emergency Department; Director, Patient Access

From: Administrative Fellow, Compliance Office

Date: January 15, 2026

Re: Whether our practice of delaying insurance questions until after the medical screening examination is required by law or only by policy

 

The Question and the Short Answer

The patient access director asked whether our emergency department policy, under which registration staff may take a patient's name and complaint on arrival but may not ask about insurance or payment until the medical screening examination has begun, is required by law or is our own preference. Short answer: the core of the policy is legally required. Federal law prohibits delaying the screening examination or stabilizing treatment in order to ask about payment or insurance. The specific timing our policy uses, waiting until the examination has begun, goes a little further than the law strictly requires and is a reasonable margin of safety that we should keep.

The Legal Sources

The governing statute is EMTALA, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. It binds any Medicare-participating hospital that operates an emergency department (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd). It obliges the hospital to give an appropriate medical screening examination to any person who presents there and asks for evaluation or care, and, if an emergency medical condition is found, to stabilize the patient or arrange an appropriate transfer.

Obligation 1: no delay for payment inquiry. Under the statute, neither the screening examination nor any further examination and treatment may be postponed so that staff can ask how the patient will pay or whether the patient is insured (42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(h)). This is a legal requirement.

Obligation 2: registration must not discourage patients from staying. The implementing regulation permits reasonable registration processes, including asking whether a patient is insured, provided the inquiry does not delay screening or treatment and does not unduly discourage patients from remaining for evaluation (42 C.F.R. § 489.24(d)(4)(iv)). This is also a legal requirement, and it is what allows some registration to happen at all before screening.

Obligation 3: the obligation belongs to the hospital. The duty to screen and stabilize falls on the hospital as a condition of its Medicare participation. Penalties can include civil monetary penalties against the hospital and physicians and, in serious cases, termination of the Medicare provider agreement, which makes the question more than one of good practice (Showalter, 2020).

What this page is doingEach obligation is tied to a statutory section or regulatory paragraph a reader can check. The memo does not ask the administrator to trust a summary of the law.
2

What Is Required, and What Is Our Choice

Required by law: that no one waits for screening because of a payment question; that registration does not discourage anyone from staying; that no one is turned away or transferred because of inability to pay.

Our choice: the rule that insurance questions wait until the examination has begun. The regulation would allow a brief insurance question at arrival if it caused no delay. Our policy avoids asking it then because, on a busy evening, a registration conversation can easily become a delay, and because a patient asked about insurance before being seen may leave, believing they will be refused. The choice gives us a margin of safety against the requirement, at a small cost in registration efficiency.

Also our choice: collecting copayments after, not before, the screening examination. Collecting payment before screening would risk both obligations. Our policy's timing is prudent.

How the Requirement Looks at the Front Desk

The legal text is short, but staff meet it in specific moments. Three situations come up often enough that the policy should address each by name.

A patient asks, before being seen, whether the hospital takes their insurance. Staff may answer the question honestly, but the answer should be paired with a clear statement that the patient will be examined regardless of coverage. The regulation's concern is a patient who leaves because of a payment conversation; an unprompted question from the patient does not change the hospital's duty, and a reassuring answer protects both the patient and the hospital.

A managed care plan requires prior authorization for emergency visits. Staff may contact the plan, but only after the screening examination has begun and never in a way that holds up screening or stabilizing care while the call is made. The same regulation addresses this directly, allowing a physician or other qualified practitioner to seek authorization at the same time as treatment is provided, not before (42 C.F.R. § 489.24(d)(4)(ii)).

A patient leaves before being examined. Staff should record the time, any stated reason, and what the patient was told, and the charge nurse should try to reach the patient. A pattern of patients leaving after a registration conversation is exactly what a surveyor would examine, so the department's monthly review of left-without-being-seen cases should include a check of what happened at the desk first.

What this page is doingThe memo moves from the legal text to the moments where staff actually apply it. A requirement explained only in the abstract is easy to agree with and easy to break on a busy night.
3

Recommendation

Keep the policy as written. Two changes would strengthen it. First, the policy should cite 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(h) and 42 C.F.R. § 489.24(d)(4)(iv) directly, so staff understand that the core is law and not preference. Second, the quick-registration screen should be reviewed to remove the insurance fields from the first step, so that the system itself cannot prompt staff to ask too early. State law and the hospital's accreditor may add requirements; this memo covers the federal requirements only. The course text's discussion of EMTALA was used for the enforcement summary (Showalter, 2020). The hospital is composite; the citations are to the current federal text, which should be checked before relying on this memo for a policy change.

References

Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd.

Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor, 42 C.F.R. § 489.24 (2025).

Showalter, J. S. (2020). The law of healthcare administration (9th ed.). Health Administration Press.

HA 625 Unit 1 instructions, in plain terms

Unit 1 asks you to write a memo identifying the legal authority behind a health care policy. Expect to restate the question, give a short answer, cite the statute and regulation, separate what the law requires from what the organization chose, apply the rule to real situations and recommend. Students often ask how to find the controlling source and how much law to quote. Start with the federal statute, then the agency regulation that carries it out, and cite both precisely. Quote only the words that decide the question. Say plainly where your organization goes beyond the minimum, since a policy that exceeds the law can still be wise. Note which layers, such as state law or accreditation, the memo does not cover.

Inside the HA 625 Unit 1 example

The memo opens with the patient access director's question and a two-sentence answer. The sources section summarizes the statute's screening and stabilization duties and the regulation's ban on delaying screening to ask about payment. The required-versus-chosen section lists three legal duties and one hospital choice, with the reason for that choice. The front desk section takes three moments staff meet often: a patient asking about coverage, a plan demanding prior authorization and a patient who wants to leave. Each gets a short instruction. The recommendation keeps the rule, asks that the policy cite its sources directly and removes insurance fields from the first registration screen. A final note limits the memo to federal law.

Reading the HA 625 Unit 1 rubric

Herzing's rubric for a regulatory authority memo usually covers the question, the short answer, legal sources, the distinction between requirement and choice, application and the recommendation. Separating what the law requires from what the organization prefers is weighed most heavily, because that distinction is the reason the memo was requested. Answer points reward a direct conclusion in the opening lines. Source criteria look for the statute and regulation cited with section numbers. Application earns credit when the rule is tested against specific situations staff actually face. Recommendation points go to practical changes tied to the analysis. Stating the memo's limits, such as state law left out, is often credited. Showalter's healthcare law text and the CMS regulation support the analysis.

HA 625 Unit 1 help before you submit

Authority memos in HA 625 Unit 1 tend to falter when the writer summarizes the statute without ever answering the question asked. Another frequent problem is citing a law by name only, with no section number. Students often treat every part of the policy as legally required, missing where the hospital chose a stricter rule. The regulation is skipped in favor of the statute alone. Real front desk situations are not discussed. Recommendations are generic, such as train staff. State law and accreditor requirements are not mentioned as limits. Secondary sources replace primary ones. Finally, keep requirement and choice in separate columns, because graders reward a memo a manager could use to explain the policy to staff.

Get a HA 625 Unit 1 example written to your instructions

Send the Unit 1 instructions and the rubric from your HA 625 classroom, plus any rule or setting your section has assigned. We write a custom example that traces the obligation to its source, quotes the operative language and states the actions and records it requires, returned in 24 to 48 hours. The first custom sample is free.

More HA 625 papers and healthcare administration samples

HA 625 Unit 1 questions, answered

Does a memo like this count as legal advice?

No, and it should not read as any. Coursework of this kind is an administrative exercise in locating obligations, not an opinion a client may rely on. Cite the current text of anything you name, say when you checked it, and write the closing as what the organization should confirm with counsel rather than as a settled ruling. Graders read that hedging as competence.

How do I tell a regulation from a policy?

Ask who punishes a breach. A regulation is issued by an agency under authority a legislature granted, appears in a published code, and is enforced through fines, exclusion or licensure action. Internal policy is written by the organization and enforced by the organization, usually through discipline. Accreditation standards sit between the two: binding by contract, consequential in practice, still not government law.

Is the opening unit of HA 625 always a memo?

No. Herzing publishes no unit by unit list of deliverables, and instructors rebuild their sections from one term to the next. Work on sources of law and the gap between regulation and internal policy commonly appears early, which is why the example takes a memo form. What you hand in is fixed by whatever your own instructor has posted.

Where can I find a free HA 625 Unit 1 sample paper?

The full HA 625 Unit 1 regulatory authority memo is free on this page, an EMTALA question about emergency registration with sources and front desk guidance. A memo on another policy question can be prepared on request.

Can a hospital ask about insurance before an emergency screening exam?

Under EMTALA, a hospital may not delay the screening exam or treatment to ask about payment or insurance. This sample explains what the law requires and why the hospital waits until the exam has begun.