A finished HA 695 Unit 5 costed business case: options weighed on stated criteria, one recommendation argued, costs by category, and a sequence carrying owners and risks. Searches like "ha 695 unit 5 assignment example", "ha695 unit 5 sample" and "ha 695 unit 5 example" land here.
What a finished HA 695 Unit 5 costed business case looks like
The finished case reads like a document heading for a meeting rather than for a grade. Two or three options are set out, each set out in enough working detail for a manager to picture it running, and one of them is usually to change nothing, since that option has a price as well. The criteria arrive before the comparison and are weighted if the writer intends to weight them, so the recommendation cannot be reverse-engineered from a preference. Costs appear in categories, with one-time expenses, recurring expenses and staff time kept apart, and the source of every figure named. The recommendation is stated as a choice with reasons rather than as a summary. Sequence, owners, dates and risks close the case, each risk paired with what would be done about it.
How a HA 695 Unit 5 example is structured
The example is arranged in the order a skeptical reader argues with it. It opens with the problem and the baseline in a short paragraph carried forward from the previous stage, because a case that restates the whole analysis loses its reader before the ask. Criteria come next and are defined and weighted openly, which is the move that makes the comparison honest. Options follow, each getting the same treatment and the same headings, including the option of leaving things as they are. A comparison table then scores them against the criteria, with the reasoning underneath it in prose. Costs are broken into categories with sources, and the recommendation follows immediately so the reader meets the price and the choice together. Sequence, owners and dates come next, and the risk section closes with mitigations rather than reassurance.
Criteria fixed before the options are scored
Cost, feasibility, time to effect and evidence strength are defined at the front, so the comparison cannot be tuned to a preferred answer.
Doing nothing costed as an option
The current state is carried in the comparison with its own price, since leaving the problem alone consumes money and hours every quarter.
Costs separated by category
One-time spending, recurring spending and staff time are kept apart with a source beside each figure, because a single total invites disbelief.
A recommendation, not a menu
The case names one option and argues for it, since a paper presenting three alternatives and deferring has handed the decision back.
Risks paired with what would be done
Each risk carries a mitigation and an owner, which reads as command of the plan rather than as a disclaimer bolted on at the end.
Where marks go in HA 695 Unit 5
A comparison that flatters one option is the tell graders look for. When two alternatives arrive described in a sentence each and the third gets three pages, the criteria were decorative and the analysis criterion suffers however good the recommendation is. Costs given as a single figure are the second loss, since nobody approving money accepts a number with no components behind it. Omitting staff time is the most common version of that failure, because hours are the real price of most changes in health care. Cases with no sequence leave a decision maker holding an idea rather than a plan. Recommendations hedged into a suggestion that the organization may wish to consider give a reader nothing to approve or refuse.
Get a HA 695 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 5 instructions and the rubric from your HA 695 classroom, plus the options you are weighing and any cost figures your organization allows you to use. We write a custom example with criteria fixed first, costs split by category, one recommendation argued and the risks paired with mitigations, returned in 24 to 48 hours. The first custom sample is free.
HA 695 Unit 5 questions, answered
How exact do the cost figures have to be?
Defensible rather than precise. A salary figure from a published wage table, a vendor list price and an hours estimate you can explain will carry the case, provided you say where each number came from and mark it as an estimate. What loses credibility is a total with no components, or a cost so round that it was clearly chosen rather than calculated.
How many options should the case compare?
Two or three worked properly, plus the current state. More than that and each one gets a paragraph, which is not enough to judge anything, and the comparison collapses into a list. Choose options that differ in kind rather than in degree, since two versions of the same idea give your criteria nothing to separate.
Can the recommendation be the cheapest option?
Certainly, if the criteria support it and you say so plainly. What a grader reads for is whether the recommendation follows from the comparison you built, not whether it is ambitious. If the cheapest option wins on your stated criteria, take it and spend the space you saved on strengthening the sequence and the risk section.