A BU 345 Unit 4 schedule and dependency chart, complete: activities sequenced with stated dependencies, durations estimated with their basis, and the critical path derived. Searches like "bu 345 unit 4 assignment example", "bu345 unit 4 sample" and "bu 345 unit 4 example" land here.
What a finished BU 345 Unit 4 schedule and dependency chart looks like
The chart is the centerpiece and the prose serves it. An activity list opens the document, each line carrying its package number from the breakdown, its duration and its predecessors, which is enough for a reader to redraw the network by hand. The diagram follows, nodes and arrows, with early and late dates written into each node and the critical path marked. A basis column records where each duration came from: a comparable job, a rate multiplied by a quantity, or a judgment call flagged as one. Underneath, a short passage names the critical path, states the project duration falling out of it, and lists the two or three activities with the least float. The durations are labeled as reasoned estimates for an invented job.
How a BU 345 Unit 4 example is structured
The activity list precedes the diagram because a network drawn first tends to acquire whatever dependencies make it look tidy. Predecessors are stated as relationships rather than as an order, since the difference between an activity that cannot start until another finishes and one that merely usually follows is the difference between a schedule and a wish list. Durations are estimated after the dependencies are fixed, which keeps a writer from shortening a job to make a path work. Each estimate names its basis on the same line, so a marker can see which numbers were reasoned and which were assumed. The passes are shown rather than summarized, because the float figures are the evidence that a critical path was calculated instead of guessed. Comment on the near critical paths closes the analysis, since those are what actually threaten the date.
Activity list before the diagram
Every activity, its duration and its predecessors are tabled first, which lets a reader rebuild the network without trusting the drawing.
Dependencies argued as relationships
Each link says why one activity cannot begin until another ends, rather than recording the order the writer happened to imagine.
Estimates carry their basis
Beside each duration sits the comparable job, the rate calculation or the frank admission of judgment that produced the figure.
Both passes shown on the page
Early and late dates appear in the nodes, since float is the evidence that the critical path was computed rather than chosen.
Float reported for the near misses
The activities with the smallest slack are named, because a path one day off critical is what usually moves a finish date.
Durations reasoned for an invented job
A closing line records that every estimate was worked out for this exercise and none was taken from an employer's planning files.
Where marks go in BU 345 Unit 4
Schedules lose marks where the network is decorative. A tidy chart with no float figures anywhere gives a marker no way to tell whether the passes were worked or the critical path was picked by eye. Durations with no basis are the commonest gap, and a column of round numbers ending in five and ten confirms it. Dependencies invented to keep the diagram flat, so that nothing runs in parallel, produce a longer project than the work requires. Activities that never appeared in the breakdown arrive from nowhere and break the thread the course is building. Lag and lead applied without explanation are unreadable. Calling every activity critical removes the concept. Real schedule exports from an employer's planning tool, dates and resource names intact, do not belong in a classroom submission.
Get a BU 345 Unit 4 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 4 instructions and the rubric from your BU 345 classroom, with the breakdown you submitted earlier and any software the section requires. We write a custom example that tables the activities first, argues each dependency, records the basis of every estimate and shows both passes. First custom sample free, back in 24 to 48 hours.
BU 345 Unit 4 questions, answered
Does the chart have to be drawn in project software?
Read the instructions, since sections vary and some accept a table plus a hand drawn network. Where software is required, submit output a marker can read at page size rather than a screenshot of a wide timeline. Where it is not, the activity table carries most of the marks anyway, because that is where dependencies and estimates can be checked.
What if the critical path runs through everything?
Then the network has almost no parallel work, which usually means dependencies were added that the job does not require. Look for activities linked only because you imagined doing them in that order. Genuinely sequential projects exist, and if yours is one, say so and show the float figures proving there was nothing available to run alongside.
How should I estimate durations for invented work?
Reason them and show the reasoning. A quantity multiplied by a rate, a comparison with a job of similar size, or a stated three point range all give a marker something to grade. What earns nothing is a column of numbers with no account of where they came from, and what causes trouble is copying real durations out of an employer's system.